zomtecos

joined 1 year ago
[–] zomtecos@feddit.de 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

You could just put it in mWh. BAM, bigger number.

3000 mAh * 3.7V = 11.100 mWh Much bigger. Much better.

I hate mAh… it’s absolutely no information how much energy is inside without taking the voltage into account. If you use directly (m)Wh, you directly have the amount of energy the battery can contain.

[–] zomtecos@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Had just 4 X-Buttons… could be worse. 🥸

[–] zomtecos@feddit.de 15 points 1 year ago

War der Betriebsurlaub bei BMW schon vorbei? Bei der Aktion am 23.8. in Regensburg war das ja eher so naja…

https://www.sueddeutsche.de/bayern/regensburg-bmw-werk-letzte-generation-klimaproteste-festgeklebt-1.6151616

[–] zomtecos@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

Damnit, I forgot one cable.

[–] zomtecos@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That’s why I switched sides. From programming myself to developing functions and writing requirements which someone else can implement into code. :)

I could do some programming (did embedded C), but surely I wasn’t the very best in it. So now I’m the guy who defines what a small (but essential) part of SW has to do which will run in hopefully a few million cars in a couple of years. :) Much more fun (and money).

[–] zomtecos@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Luckily the Discovery came from the past and saved everyone with the funghi-drive. :)

Discovery had some nice ideas but… well. Alone the constant drama and crying Michael Burnham made the series quite unattractive.

Also the story behind the great Dilithium Explosion. Well. A sad, and alone child. Well. They could have thought about something better.

There were better ST series.

[–] zomtecos@feddit.de 26 points 1 year ago (5 children)

His first kid was called „My“?

[–] zomtecos@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Actually, it’s not just another plug. The fact that the same Pins are used for AC and DC charging adds a little bit more complexity to the car. Either you need additional switches in the car to separate the Onboard AC-Charger from the charging port, or the AC-Charger must be designed to withstand an DC input on its AC-Input contacts. That probably won’t be the biggest problem when the DC-voltage is just around 400V, as the AC-voltage is not that far away.

But if you switch to 800V Batteries (which most of the industry is doing), that probably could get more challenging, as the AC-charging-voltage won’t change.

We‘ll see what the car industries solution will be.

[–] zomtecos@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (7 children)

What is the currently maximum available performance of NACS?

CCS is designed up to 1000V and 500A. Charging stations offer typically up to 350 kW.

What do the available NACS charging stations offer? As I remember Tesla is only using 400V batteries, so with 500A they only get up to 200kW.

So the switch to NACS sounds like a performance downgrade. But yes: probably a usability upgrade but at the cost of longer charging times.

Is Tesla planning to switch to 800V too? So they can deliver more performance?

[–] zomtecos@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Do they still release lions and tigers within the coliseum?

[–] zomtecos@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Exactly like mine. 96% since release. I’m using AOD and 99% wireless charging.

It’s ok, never had any issues with my battery life that I ran out of energy.

We probably have to accept, that these battery’s are performing at their very limit and have no thermal system to keep them in a specific temperature range.

My iPhone X was about the same. In installed a new battery when it was 2.5 years old and I used it for 5 years. I will probably do the same with my 14 Pro.

[–] zomtecos@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago
view more: ‹ prev next ›