Ask Lemmygrad

995 readers
92 users here now

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
51
 
 

Edit: if you only have the clip, please upload it to tankie.tube and share it with me

52
53
54
55
 
 

The criminal court system in the US seems incredibly unjust and results in the criminalization of many activities which ought to be basic rights. It railroads innocent and completely functioning people into the morally bankrupt prison system where they are put into dehumanizing circumstances and extreme scrutiny that gives prison authorities more excuses to add charges and prison time, continuing the cycle further.

"Defendants" - itself a backwards term in the context of presumption of innocence - are unable to defend themselves using their own brains, knowledge and skills because of the incredibly confusing and non-intuitive procedure and rules in the court. Unless they are a lawyer themselves, they must either hire or be assigned a professional by the court to work on their behalf, but those lawyers often have incentives that stop them from fully embracing the defendant's interests. For example the lawyer knows she must return to the court and work with the same judge and possibly the same prosecutors again, and therefore she wants to make sure she appears professional and makes arguments that are acceptable by court standards. Lawyers will often tell their clients that either the client goes along with the plan set by the law team or they find a new team to represent them, which results in a loss of agency for the client who may be facing decades in jail and never gets a chance to actually voice their opinion.

Judges, lawyers, court staff and police work closely together and form personal bonds that can often work against the defendant. Judges can make sweeping judgements in lower courts and bench trials based on pure opinion. Judges and even juries are legally allowed to be biased against defendants for actions in court that has nothing to do with the charges.

This is just a few things I've noticed from watching trials, but it is difficult to find any other opinions on these topics, at least on the internet, because it seems to be so skewed in favor of the court system. I cannot find much of anything offering the sort of criticisms that I've offered above in printed format. I'm open to the idea that I've just completely misunderstood and that these things are somehow fair, but I'm just not seeing it. Please tell me if you disagree with anything I've said and explain why because I want to understand why this is considered justice.

Have any Marxists written about similar topics? What would a good socialist "justice system" look like? Are there / were there socialist countries that have decent models? What differences would Marxists ideally want to implement to change the criminal court system? Would they abolish it altogether, and if so, what stage of communism would that occur?

Any thoughts you have are appreciated. Thanks

56
 
 

Tried to cross-Post from Hexbear. Doesn't work well with Jerboa.

I don't really have a specific question, I'm just wondering how Laos is. Do people have any thoughts, interesting facts, or information about it?

So the context is that I've been doing a re-watch of King of the Hill, where Hank's neighbor is Laotian, at the same time I've been listening to the latest season of Blowback, which is about the area formerly known as French Indochina, but more specifically Cambodia and Vietnam. They don't really talk about Laos much, which makes sense.

In King of the Hill though, there's a couple references to a communist dictatorship in Laos. I just finished an episode where a former guerilla veteran is trying to recruit Laotians in the US to go back and fight this government. One of the funny parts to me, is that whether that government is bad or good but poor as a result of historical conditions, I see Kahn as the kind of person who would be wooed away to the USA with Hollywood images of the American Dream. He seems to work hard, but is obsessed with status, success, and commodities. Anyway, it's not a political show, so combined with that Blowback season, it's just enough information to get me curious lol.

I could review Wikipedia but it tends to be biased against communist nations, and I'd rather supplement boring scrolling of articles with interesting conversations. Especially since it's in the same general area as one of the most based communist parties I've studied so far (in Vietnam) and probably the worst one I've studied so far (the Khmer Rouge).

57
 
 

I heard rumors of them wanting to declare war on each other

58
 
 
59
 
 
60
 
 
61
 
 

I am watching Portuguese news right now and there is a very angry debate going on between Luís Montenegro and André Ventura.

I cannot understand what they are saying really but it seems that Portugal is having an election due to “conflict of interest” regarding Montenegro’s family business. My Vavó said something about the PM’s wife but even she is confused about it. I find it funny that they’re having these two right-wing dudes go off on each other on TV but nothing for the PCP-CDU.

I’ve tried to explain to my Vavó that the Ventura guy sucks but it’s difficult to get a handle on things (she thinks he has good points on calling the current PM a liar). Isn’t he also a fan of Salazar? Is Portuguese media trying to drum up more support for CHEGA?

I am always worried about Portugal and since it’s the day before April 25th (anniversary of the Carnation Revolution) I’m a bit more antsy.

62
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/29024092

Edit: Found it

63
64
65
 
 

Sticking to your stereotype = treated like a doormat

Breaking your stereotype = whites get threatened and lash you

What's the winning move? To not play at all and just go back to China?

66
67
 
 

In my view,among American socdems,he is the best.

68
 
 
69
 
 

In my opinion,the rito in 1989 is the most dangerous time for CPC since the establishment of PRC.What Zhao did deteriorated the riot

70
16
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Coco0330@lemmygrad.ml to c/asklemmygrad@lemmygrad.ml
 
 

~___~

71
 
 

Thoughts?

72
73
 
 

I don’t know what to think of them they are Pro-China and we’re against aggression in Syria but they also endorsed Erdogan in the latest election. Just wanna know your thoughts?

74
 
 

Hey, just made an account after lurking here for like a year or so. Anyway, I just got out of a rather exhausting conversation with some friends where the topic of Ukraine came up and I tried my best to give a reasonable overview of why people in Crimea/DPR/LPR would support joining Russia, complete with several sources on the brutality of the Ukrainian government in the years since Maidan. Almost immidiately I got hit with "Well I have Ukrainian friends who say that Russia is the problem." I've noticed very often that people will trust what they've heard personally from people they know over any evidence you give them. My question is, has anyone found an effective way to get through to people who entirely base their stance on an issue on what the people they know personally have to say? How do you show someone that they need to look beyond what their token friend has to say and actually study the topic themselves?

75
view more: ‹ prev next ›