this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
874 points (99.3% liked)

Political Memes

5404 readers
3322 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I really want to emphasize that Jefferson was not a good guy, not morally good at all, definitely raped his slave Sally Hemmings who was probably younger than 15 when it started but at least 15 (Jefferson was in his 40s). Prevented her from fleeing his rape house when he took her to France by promising he'd free her whole family and her when they got back, and then didn't (because he wanted to keep raping her, probably). Oh and also, her brother went to France with them and learned French cooking for Jefferson, and the ice cream recipe he used for Jefferson is still served to this day at Mt Rushmore as Thomas Jefferson's ice cream. Even though it's not his.

https://www.vox.com/2016/4/8/11389556/thomas-jefferson-sally-hemings-book

This is not a man with a good moral backbone. For reference, literally no other founder did anything like this. Sure, many cheated - with adults who weren't their personal child slaves. This is extremely disturbing, and before anyone goes to defend him, really ask yourself why you're empathizing with Jefferson here and not poor Sally.

There are better philosophers out there.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Wow you got me, I'm actually a racing racist and pedo just because I mentioned that one of the most prominent founding fathers was not terribly religious (??)

[–] MetaCubed@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

What a terribly bad faith interpretation of their comment. Theyre making the point that while it's neat that Jefferson de-religioned the bible, and left the philosophy, Jefferson himself wasn't exactly an ethical paragon and that should be remembered. It wasn't an attack against you.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They replied to me, and it had nothing to do with the topic at hand (the founding fathers' religious beliefs). It's like barging into a conversation about the autobahn yelling GUYS, HITLER WAS REALLY BAD! I WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT!

[–] MetaCubed@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I mean, the broader thread has been talking about the philosophy and such included in the Jefferson bible. Seems pretty reasonable to put a note on a link to the thing just for the edification of anyone that checks it out.

Its more akin to being adjacent to a conversation about the history of the autobahn, and being the one to say "so for anyone who's not aware, the autobahn was largely built by the Nazis"

It wasn't an attack on you, just context for those who weren't aware.

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What? Where did I state that?

I'm giving context to people reading your suggestion -that Jefferson isn't a saint and we have evidence he was engaging in some really immoral actions, even for the time. That's relevant when we are talking about philosophy and how he may have used this work to justify some of these beliefs.

It's fine to like a work and be critical of that work. Critical thinking is good.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Great, thankfully I didn't say any of those things, so I'm not sure why you're calling me out on a conversation you seem to be having only with yourself. What a weird interjection to make. Should I always include a disclaimer warning people not to go on a rampage against the Marcomanni if I mention Meditations?

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sure, give whatever historical context you like. To me, a woman, that he was a rapist is highly notable. Women have been calling out rapist men, because they tend to be Bad Guys in general who have certain beliefs that are Bad (which is what enables them to rape). What Jefferson did with his slave is like a horror movie. It's genuinely disturbing to think about. Would you like to be some 40 year old guy's fuck meat at age 15? How about at the age you are now?

It's like if people started talking about R Kelly's music - and I'm like hey, for context, many of these girls he's talking about were child victims - it changes his music. Thomas Jefferson factually did those things and it should be part of his history when we talk about his philosophies and morals.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I would wholeheartedly agree with you if that was little-known, but — and I admit, I'm guessing here — I'd be very surprised if most people on Lemmy don't know he was a slaveowner and a rapist. This place is basically a commune of nerds with strong left-wing political opinions. I really don't think we need to preface things that everyone here already knows are bad. We're also talking about slavery, but don't feel the need to point out that actually, slavery is really not great (something that might be important to remind others of on, say, Twitter).

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Cool, so if it is known, then me adding historical context as a starting point for a greater conversation about how his philosophy and morals lined up with his life as we understand it - is perfect for Lemmy :)