this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
224 points (96.3% liked)

The Far Side

5646 readers
523 users here now

Hello fellow Far Side fans!

About this community and how I post the comic strip… Many moons ago, I would ask my Dad to save the newspaper for me everyday so I could read my favorite comic strips and one of those was The Far Side. These days of course you find just about anything online including www.thefarside.com where they post several comics a day and I repost them here. Just to note, the date you see in my posts is not the initial release date, but the date they were posted on the website.

The Far Side is a single-panel comic created by Gary Larson and syndicated by Chronicle Features and then Universal Press Syndicate, which ran from December 31, 1979, to January 1, 1995 (when Larson retired as a cartoonist). Its surrealistic humor is often based on uncomfortable social situations, improbable events, an anthropomorphic view of the world, logical fallacies, impending bizarre disasters, (often twisted) references to proverbs, or the search for meaning in life… Read more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Far_Side

Hope you enjoy and feel free to contribute to the community with art, cool stuff about the author, tattoos, toys and anything else, as long it’s The Far Side!

Ps. Sub to all my comic strip communities:

Bello Bear !BelloBear@lemmy.world https://lemmy.world/c/bellobearofficial

Bloom County !bloomcounty@lemm.ee https://lemm.ee/c/bloomcounty

Calvin and Hobbes !calvinandhobbes@lemmy.world https://lemmy.world/c/calvinandhobbes

Cyanide and Happiness !cyanideandhappiness https://lemm.ee/c/cyanideandhappiness

Garfield !garfield@lemmy.world https://lemmy.world/c/garfield

The Far Side !thefarside@sh.itjust.works https://lemmy.world/c/thefarside@sh.itjust.works

Fine print: All comics I post are freely available online. In no way am I claiming ownership, copyright or anything else. This is a not for profit community, we just want to enjoy our comics, thank you.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 20 points 4 months ago (2 children)

No. The Bible makes it clear that you can only believe in one God and the first line of the Nicene creed is "We believe in one God"

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social -3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The Old Testament does makes it fairly clear that there are other gods, because it started as a polytheistic religion, Jehovah is just supposed to be your favorite (or he'll kill you).

It's the modern interpretations that decided to interpret that as monotheism, but that includes Christianity.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

There's no evidence for your claim. And the old testament does not. Yes, it refers to other gods as concepts but not as literal Gods

[–] kofe@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The first commandment is literally "you shall have no other gods before me." If you look at different historical translations and viewpoints, it is well accepted that Judaism experienced a shift from polytheism to monotheism, and there is more evidence of that in the Old Testament. Passages referring to Yahwehs wife, waging war to defeat other gods, etc.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's talking about concepts, and the false gods existing as a concept. You could even have something like money, etc, be your god. What's your source on "Yahweh's wife" apart from the Church itself being His bride? (Which still doesn't make the Church a god)

[–] kofe@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There's verses in Kings, Judges, and I'll look back over my Jewish Studies course notes from last semester for more academic sources tomorrow. Notably the worship of Baal and Asherah are present, and iirc Asherah was associated with some Israelites to be Yahwehs wife. We're talking pre-Greek and Roman time periods where Gods were considered much more physical - as we see with Genesis with Yahweh referred to as walking in the garden.

The concepts of gods being more etherial didn't come about for a few more centuries after, maybe by the time Christianity started popping off (again, gotta go to sleep but will check dates if ya need tomorrow). See also the Cyprus Cylinder for comparison and reference to conquering of the Israelites, orders that allowed them to continue to worship as they pleased, while still essentially talking shit and saying "Our God is stronger than yours."

May be worth asking chatgpt. The Bible has been rewritten so many times to adjust for major cultural shifts, but there's definitely evidence within it and other historical writings.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'll need to know the exact verses. Yahweh has already had a physical form - through Jesus, who's identified as the actual creator of the world. There are plenty of appearances Jesus makes in the Old Testament as well through Christophanies. Now I hear you saying something about "oh that's just a modern Christian interpretation put on old Jewish texts", but the Incarnation of our Lord actually shows that God has always had that physical aspect of Him - Jesus Christ. Who was shown in fullness during the 33~ years He was on earth.

Again, the existence of worship of other gods like Baal and Asherah doesn't mean Christianity was ever polytheistic - in fact, the narrative strongly shows Baal and Asherah to be false gods - attributions. Not something that was actually canon, just a competing belief system. Kind of like how Mormonism claims to be an addition to Christianity, yet isn't Christian canon but is just a competing belief system, you had someone attributing a goddess to a yahweh as his wife.

In Christianity though, the bride of Christ is actually The Church - but that's a whole and another topic.

[–] kofe@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I mean, idk if we're having some difference in understanding, but this is a bit out of my scope as far as spiritual interpretation. I'm an atheist looking at it more in thought experiment mode with some historical reference. If those are your beliefs then power to ya, but it's not quite my bag of tea to debate spiritualism, sorry:) if I've misunderstood please lemme know

[–] KoboldOfArtifice@ttrpg.network 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Their claim does have support in so far that the early testament contains a lot of work written by polytheistic people that later in would become the monolatrists and even later monotheists that we know as Jews, further branching off into what today are Christians.

This does not mean that Christians in any sense are not purely monotheistic. Not only are they so, it's one of the most critical parts of their beliefs, to the point where even believing that their one god has in any way shape or form some kind of tangible division is considered strict heresy from trinitarian churches which form the mainstream of Christianity and have done so for hundreds of years.

Edit: There is a great video by Alex O'Connor interviewing Esoterica on that topic in particular and they talk about the evidence that supports the viewpoints.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social -5 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] Xanis@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You tell him to read a book.

I think you should open your eyes.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You'll find that's usually the way the sighted read books.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I've read a book; the Bible, and it makes it clear that there are no other gods. Even an atheist can read the Bible and decipher that

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

As if it's not typical for y'all to read something and decide it means what you want it to mean and not what it literally says ;)

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 0 points 4 months ago

Yes, plenty of people do this. Notably theological liberals and people who view other doctrines and worldviews in judgement of the Bible. This isn't the standpoint I am arguing for, though.