this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
1134 points (98.7% liked)

Memes

45575 readers
1614 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 82 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, I set the toaster on fire once also. I had read online that you can make cheese toast in there if you turn the toaster sideways so that the cheese is on top vs gravity. It might have worked if the toaster hadn't caught fire. I had to throw it out the front door into the yard

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 47 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I'm actually kind of amazed that the failure mode for "toaster used sideways" is that it just catches fire. That's one hell of a design flaw.

[–] kevindqc@lemmy.world 47 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Is it a design flaw if someone uses the toaster in a way it's clearly not intended for, and food touches the hot elements and catches fire?

[–] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 28 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Id say the design flaw is allowing it to function in that position at all. Put a gravity switch in there like space heaters have, so that it it tilts more than a few degrees it shuts off

[–] Zoot@reddthat.com 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How the hell am I supposed to make my quasedilla on the ISS then?!

[–] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 7 points 3 months ago

Duh, space walk with it and point it at the sun. That's just common sense.

[–] StaticFalconar@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Tired of burning your house down when you want to use your toaster toske something not toast? Introducing the toaster oven. For when you want to toast something besides bread.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago

Maxim number 50, if it only works in exactly the way the manufacturer intended, it is defective.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you didn't expect a machine that has very hot elements very close to your food to make such food burn if used wrongly, that's on you.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I agree, but I feel like having the toaster itself catch fire could have been mitigated somehow.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Then you get to play the “asbestos flakes or salt?” game. Fun for the whole family!

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That said, eating asbestos flakes isn't the most dangerous thing. Plastic partially burning close to your food, but too slowly for you to notice seems way worse... And there are many fire retardants that are safer to handle in a factory but that will give you a really bad time if you eat them.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Fire "removedants?" You mean fire removedants? How about artardents? I suppose one could argue that the automatic censorship of your word is a form of dysfunctional regulation.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Does ML censors parts of words now?

[–] blackbrook@mander.xyz 4 points 3 months ago

There's all sorts of inappropriate ways to use a toaster where the failure mode is fire. Making toast in bed, under the covers? Catch fire. In a puddle of gasoline? Catch fire. Seriously, WTC toasters?

[–] fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net 23 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I’m pretty sure that was a famous internet prank.

[–] chevy9294@monero.town 2 points 3 months ago

Or an average Reddit post.