84
submitted 10 months ago by iusearchbtw@lemmy.sdf.org to c/gaming@beehaw.org

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/2277558

On PC, the game is 139.84 GB. On console, it's 100.19 GB for Standard or 117.07 GB for the Premium Edition

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Crankpork@beehaw.org 30 points 10 months ago

I want to play it, but finding 120gb for Baldur’s Gate 3 was hard enough, so I’m going to have to pass until I can afford a bigger hard drive.

[-] phuntis@sopuli.xyz 15 points 10 months ago

I'm pretty sure bethesda said playing starfield with a hard drive isn't great 1tb SSDs aren't too expensive anymore I'd really recommend moving away from a hard drive

[-] Crankpork@beehaw.org 46 points 10 months ago

Ah, yeah, I was using hard drive as a catch-all term. My laptop only holds M.2 drives. I’m old, it’s all hard drives to me. =P

[-] MrZee@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Old curmudgeons unite! I totally knew what you meant.

Edit: that said, I would add NVMe SSD as the way to go… although I think that is pretty much all you find these days. Are non-nvme m.2 drives a thing?

[-] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago

Yeah you can get SATA m.2 drives.

[-] lloram239@feddit.de 3 points 10 months ago

M.2 SATA drives are still a thing, same port, but different slower protocol as NVMe. They are less common, but still around and available in TB size. Don't think there is any reason to get this outside of compatibility with old hardware.

There is also mSATA, which is a different port from M.2, but has a very similar look and size. Also slower than NVMe and no reason to get them unless you have hardware that uses them (e.g. some old Beelink miniPC have them).

[-] interolivary@beehaw.org 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I definitely support the hypothesis that calling all storage drives hard drives is an old curmudgeon thing 😅 I've been doing computer nerdery for way over 30 years, and a hard drive is a hard drive even if it doesn't have spinny disks in it

[-] Crankpork@beehaw.org 4 points 10 months ago

I don't know when I became my mother. It happened so gradually I barely even noticed.

[-] interolivary@beehaw.org 4 points 10 months ago

I think we all swear to ourselves that we won't grow up to be like those old people who seem to cling to the past.

Then one day you find yourself going "well it's a hard drive to me, I don't care what it should be called"

[-] averyminya@beehaw.org 3 points 10 months ago

SSD's are hard!

[-] hogart@feddit.nu 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

A 1tb Steam Deck-sized NVMe drive is about 120 bucks right now. Not cheap. But not insanely prices either.

[-] phuntis@sopuli.xyz 3 points 10 months ago
[-] interolivary@beehaw.org 13 points 10 months ago

Huh I always thought "hard drive" was the umbrella category, and SSDs and spinny disk drives are subcategories.

[-] Onihikage@beehaw.org 8 points 10 months ago

I think storage or storage drive is the umbrella term these days. "Hard drive" was always short for "Hard Disk Drive" (which was named in comparison to Floppy Disk Drive) but since it was the only type of drive used for non-volatile internal storage for a good 20 years or so, it became a catch-all term. These days, many people understand there's two different kinds and a lot of systems have both, so hard drive is becoming recognized to mean the spinning disks; as opposed to SSD, which is now an umbrella term incorporating 2.5" SATA, M.2 SATA, and M.2 NVMe, which are all Solid State Drives but different combinations of interfaces and form factors.

[-] Poggervania@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

Nah, the "SS" and "HD" bits refers to how each storage disk reads data. HDDs use hard metal disks to read & write data, hence it got the misnomer hard disk drive. SSDs use solid state flash memory to read & write data, hence it being called a solid state drive.

If you want the general category, you'd want to say "storage drive" specifically since if you say "drive", that can also refer to an optical drive (AKA the CD slot) or a USB drive (AKA flash/thumb drives).

[-] Blake@feddit.uk 3 points 10 months ago

The classic, computer science term for all of these devices is "secondary storage", if anyone's looking for a way to confuse people briefly before explaining that you mean "hard drives, SSDs, etc."

[-] thanevim@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

I've been seeing both recently. I've opted to err on the same side and just make it clear when I'm talking about spinning rust versus solid state.

[-] Naatan@lemmy.one 4 points 10 months ago

You do realize storage drives aren’t exactly expensive?

[-] ag_roberston_author@beehaw.org 21 points 10 months ago

Not expensive, but it's another expense that not everyone can drop immediately.

For most it would be a choice of upgrading to a new drive or getting two games.

[-] pixelscience@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I'm pretty conscious of other people financial situations, but a 512GB SSD is 19.99 on amazon. That's 1/3 the price of the game.

[-] ag_roberston_author@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago

If you have a 512gb SSD and want more space than you need an 1tb or 2tb, and NVME m2s cost more than regular ssds

[-] averyminya@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago

Not really honestly. 1TB Sabrent rocket is $40. 1TB SATA SSD is $34.

[-] Naatan@lemmy.one 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Sure. And of course it remains to be seen whether Starfield is worth it, but it's undeniable that a game of this magnitude isn't a common occurrence. If they realize the game's potential, then missing out on it because of a relatively inexpensive hardware upgrade seems like a shame.

[-] sim_@beehaw.org 6 points 10 months ago

Is a game like Starfield “missable” though? Games like this’ll realistically be accessible for years (decades?) to come (not even counting Bethesda’s love of rereleasing their latest hit a la Skyrim lol). They might miss out on the cultural discussion if the game’s a hit though, that’s definitely a trade-off of late adoption, like what I’m experiencing with BG3 lol.

[-] Naatan@lemmy.one 2 points 10 months ago

Yeah that’s fair. It might even be worth waiting a year so the community can fix all the bugs :p I know I’m too impulsive to wait that long though. Played through Cyberpunk at launch and loved it!

[-] ram@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

a game of this magnitude isn’t a common occurrence.

It kind of is though. We've already had at least 3 games of this magnitude drop this year alone.

[-] Naatan@lemmy.one 2 points 10 months ago

I’m guessing one of those is Baldurs Gate, but I’m struggling to think of two more. There’s been some decent games for sure but none other that I’d put on the same scale. Diablo 4 had the potential but squandered it imo.

[-] ram@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

None are baldur's gate. While I'm loving baldur's gate, it's far from a market disruptor. The three games I was thinking of were TOTK, Diablo 4, and FFXVI.

[-] Naatan@lemmy.one 2 points 10 months ago

To each their own of course, but out of the 4 games you named in your comment I would definitely rank BG3 on top on a scale of "market disruption".

https://www.sportskeeda.com/esports/baldur-s-gate-3-s-ambition-deemed-anomaly-third-party-developers-gamers-want-become-standard

That said this is all highly subjective of course. One person's game of the year is another person's biggest disappointment.

[-] ram@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

To be clear, of the ones listed I only care about TOTK and BG3. I'm looking at "megaton games" by a general ascertainment of how relevant they are to the enthusiast gamers, and how much they sell. FFXVI came out and kinda did not great for an FF game so I'll concede there. No idea about Diablo 4, I assume it was middling or "as expected", while TOTK sold 18 million in its first 6 weeks; though I may largely be familiar with that due to being in proximity of Nintendo-related circles.

It really is subjective what measure we're using though. BG3's been amazing in relative terms to what would typically be expected of "DnD RPG" (maybe there's a better term), and developers have been reacting to it far more than they would most other megaton games. TOTK's no slouch on its own, impressing developers over its extremely impressive yet performent physics engine.

https://www.polygon.com/legend-zelda-tears-kingdom/23737921/tears-of-the-kingdom-bridge-physics-game-devs-explain

Anyways, not really interested in arguing my perspective though, since like you said this is extremely subjective, and honestly quite arbitrary.

[-] Naatan@lemmy.one 2 points 10 months ago

All fair points. I wasn't trying to argue, just to have a friendly discourse :) My calling it a "game of magnitude" is obviously very open to interpretation.

For what it's worth what I was trying to say was that this game has the potential to be unlike any game before it, so it'd be a shame to miss out on it just to avoid a minor hardware upgrade. But that in itself is of course also subjective. Suffice to say I myself won't be missing out.. :p

[-] ram@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

Fair say! I'm personally not someone who particularly vibes with the aesthetic of bethesda games so I'll be missing out, but I hope it's as good as fans expect ❤️

[-] Luvon@beehaw.org 3 points 10 months ago

M2 pcie 4 drives are getting pretty cheap recently. I got a 2tb one for 100 with a heat sink on sale. My main from Kingston was 70 with 1tb

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
84 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30220 readers
47 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS