this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
248 points (98.8% liked)

politics

19072 readers
4297 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Loraine Pellegrino admitted to misdemeanor charge of filing a false document, with 17 other people charged in case

A Republican activist who signed a document falsely claiming Donald Trump had won Arizona in 2020 became the first person to be convicted in the state’s fake elector case.

Loraine Pellegrino, a past president of the group Ahwatukee Republican Women, has pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of filing a false document, the Arizona attorney general’s office spokesperson, Richie Taylor, said on Tuesday, declining to comment further. Records documenting her guilty plea have not yet been posted by the court. Still, court records show Pellegrino was sentenced to unsupervised probation. Before the plea, she faced nine felony charges.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 57 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Seriously? She pleaded down from 9 felonies to 1 misdemeanor and was sentenced to unsupervised probation? Was this another cooperation agreement? Is she going to testify against her co-conspirators or what?

[–] ganksy@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's what a plea bargain is. If she doesn't complete the terms of the bargain, the charges will be reinstated. It is likely to testify against the other defendants but whatever it is, it wasn't trivial.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not necessarily. In some cases, prosecutors will allow a defendant to plead to a lesser charge because simply it saves time and money. Trials are expensive and prosecutor time is valuable so sometime they just take the win on a lesser charge to put the trial to bed. In this case, there is no further comment from anyone about the details of the plea. This suggests that Pellegrino pleaded guilty to the lesser charge, said she was sorry, and the court let her off with something that isn't even a slap on the wrist.

Jenna Ellis also took a plea deal in this case. However, in the reporting on that deal, it specifically says that she will cooperate with the prosecution.

In exchange for dropping nine felony counts against her, Ellis agreed to "provide truthful information" to the Attorney General's Office and "testify completely and truthfully" in the case, per the terms of Ellis' cooperation agreement with the AG's Office.

All they are saying about Pellegrino is that there is no further comment on the plea in this article. Axios has slightly more. They say she's getting three years unsupervised probation (The Guardian article left out the length of the sentence) and adds this:

The attorney general's office wouldn't comment on whether Pellegrino will be required to testify or cooperate with the prosecution, saying the court has sealed the plea agreement.

Why would they seal this plea agreement but not the Ellis agreement where she is required to fully cooperate? Why is Pellegrino getting such a sweetheart deal?

[–] ganksy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

That's a great question.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Would not surprise me at all to hear she’s now a cooperating witness against some higher-up defendants.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, what astounds me that there aren't more people willing to flip in these cases?