this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
1552 points (99.1% liked)

People Twitter

4809 readers
780 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying.
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
1552
Unbelievable (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by ModerateImprovement@sh.itjust.works to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
137 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://social.ridetrans.it/users/daihard/statuses/112941278386750975

Link in the post: https://publicola.com/2024/08/09/kevin-dave-officer-who-struck-and-killed-23-year-old-student-is-challenging-his-traffic-ticket/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Manslaughter. But yeah, fuck this guy.

[–] BlackDragon@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Murder. You're not going 75mph in a 25mph zone and trying not to kill people. Doesn't matter whether there was a specific target in mind.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 2 points 1 month ago

If you do it in a car it's all good. Evidently if you get killed by a speeding hunk of metal, it's really important to differentiate between the different sizes.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Murder requires malice (i.e. intent), and you don't meet the standard of intent just by exceeding some level of recklessness/negligence.

[–] BlackDragon@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Driving 75mph in a 25mph zone is malicious and indicates intent to kill people.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, that's not how intent works. What it shows is recklessness.

[–] BlackDragon@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe that's not how it works by your definition of intent, but it certainly is how it works in mine.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] BlackDragon@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

Right, and I'm not a prosecutor so I don't give a fuck about specific legal definitions.

[–] pyrflie@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Considering the PU interference I would say murder second class is justified.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

I don't think fuckery after-the-fact can change whether you intended to kill someone.