If you do it in a car it's all good. Evidently if you get killed by a speeding hunk of metal, it's really important to differentiate between the different sizes.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Murder requires malice (i.e. intent), and you don't meet the standard of intent just by exceeding some level of recklessness/negligence.

[–] BlackDragon@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Driving 75mph in a 25mph zone is malicious and indicates intent to kill people.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No, that's not how intent works. What it shows is recklessness.

[–] BlackDragon@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Maybe that's not how it works by your definition of intent, but it certainly is how it works in mine.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm just using the legal definition.

[–] BlackDragon@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago

Right, and I'm not a prosecutor so I don't give a fuck about specific legal definitions.