this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
688 points (92.6% liked)

Fuck Cars

9788 readers
321 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 29 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Choosing to buy an impractical vehicle does not give one a pass to park incorrectly

[–] Gestrid@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Technically, parking with a part sticking out is still parking incorrectly.

Taking up two spots, while still incorrect, is still safer for all involved and won't potentially block traffic. I'm speaking as someone who has nearly hit a truck that was sticking out while turning into a parking lot (I wasn't able to see the truck prior to turning) on at least a couple of occasions.

Safety > Convenience

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Better idea: Don't buy a truck that's too big to use safely....

[–] Gestrid@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

He's parked at an IKEA. I'm willing to bet he's a contractor that needs that long of a truck to fit everything he buys (including stuff from Home Depot or Lowe's).

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee -1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Contractors didn't exist before trucks became stupid huge? I didn't know that...

[–] erin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 months ago

Do you think the first long truck sprang into existence in 2008? We've had super long trucks for specific use cases as long as we've had trucks. This is like one of the few times a person has a good reason to have a large vehicle, and is being safe and polite about it by staying out of the way and writing a polite note to explain. Large vehicles aren't the problem, people owning large vehicles who don't need them are the problem.

[–] Gestrid@lemmy.ca -2 points 4 months ago

Contractors did exist. Innovation usually happens because enough people have a want or need for something for some reason. It's entirely possible (or even likely) that long trucks came into existence because contractors had a need for them. Ford and other truck companies saw an opportunity to make money from that need and obliged.