this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
1116 points (98.9% liked)
Enough Musk Spam
2204 readers
176 users here now
For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.
No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.
Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.
Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.
Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I suspect it's a complex situation with multiple paths to get there. As it states in that paper "Further research is required". Based on the paper, I'm not even sure they really had a comprehensive sampling, since it's a meta-analysis and the source material is generally pretty limited. For example: "It is however noted that the small sample size (n=17) provides only weak evidence to support the finding and as such the results should be taken with caution."
Just like there are multiple paths to having different vision (genetics, developmental anomalies, illness, environmental, trauma), I suspect there's enough nuance in gender identity for there to be multiple paths there as well.