this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
344 points (98.6% liked)

Science Memes

11148 readers
2022 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Why are scientists absolutely terrible at naming planets?

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

naw. they just stopped naming the children after the first couple rounds of olympians.

why name them when there's a few hundred a month? breed like rabbits, Olympians. probably out of boredom.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I know that Olympians fuck like rabbits, but they only meet up once every four years. Can't be that massive of a population increase.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You really think Zeus is gonna have that long of a dry spell? Never mind Aphrodite or Dionysus?

I bet Hera is a closet freak, too. (Zeus just doesn't like the whips.)

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

From what I can tell, they've all had a several thousand years dry spell. Haven't seen those guys around in a long time.

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Assuming they started off as two of them 2000 years ago and Fibonacci was right about rabbit breeding habits (and Olympians mature in 4 years time and don't menopause before the age of 2000). We'd have 139423224561697880139724382870407283950070256587697307264108962948325571622863290691557658876222521294125 (500th element of the Fibonacci sequence (2000 years / 4 years = 500 Olympian breeding seasons). There'd be plenty of them to name planets after.

[–] wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Then use words, or some blob of syllables of some kind of description.

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's like in No Man's Sky where you start out giving thoughtful names to every planet you come across, but after about twenty systems you're running into similar world types and color schemes that evoke the same names you've already used, so you just stop giving a shit and stick with the names the planets are generated with.

[–] wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago

I guess that's a good point.

[–] herrvogel@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There are approximately two metric shit tons of planets. I assume scientists have better things to do with their time than to sit around and think of names to give to every single one of those.

[–] wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

I just assumed all the ones we would actually hear about would get named more regularly. But I guess if they're talking about a specific one, this would happen. I never really thought about how many must really be out there, but now it seems obvious.

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 2 points 3 months ago

They do have rules, they're not completely pulling these names out of their arses