this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
26 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22842 readers
193 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When trying to explain the us/israel relationship I always get hung up on this part, which is the most immediate experience people in western countries have with the conflict. Were people getting fired for voicing mild criticism of apartheid south africa at work?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dolores@hexbear.net 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

it's a weird rhetorical trick to wrap people's heads around, it's US repression against US citizens for opposing US policy, it's all coming from inside the house. but because it's posed as support for 'another state' people's nationalist wires get crossed. i've got to wonder if the state intentionally designed their rhetoric this way or just accidentally fell into it from the antisemites propagating israel-as-controller narratives.

but maybe it'd be easy to explain by historical allusion: no one would take seriously the idea that South Vietnam was orchestrating US aid & deployments to itself or directing US troops to kill college students in the US. the illusion of Israel's freedom of action can be analyzed in the details today but even the overwhelming media perception of its independence will be swept away with time, just like the idea 'South Vietnam' was a real country the US was simply helping out