this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
935 points (90.9% liked)

solarpunk memes

2800 readers
319 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mriormro@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I'm not sure calling democratic socialism a centrist political system is reasonable.

[–] voldage@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why though? What makes it a centrist system in your view? Elaborate.

[–] mriormro@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

My own political vantage?

Modern democratic socialism as an idea is well over 200 years old at this point. It's moved beyond the leftist fringe and it's ideas have become relatively institutionalized in a lot of developed nations (at least partially).

Hence, the window has shifted and what was once seen as radical policies of Democratic socialism have become relatively mainstream.

[–] voldage@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I see your point, and it's true that a lot of earlier propositions of socialism are already implemented and seen as desirable by most people, but I think that's something to be said about left wing in general. We're no longer fighting to abolish 20 hours work day, instead it's 32 hours work week now. As the window has moved, so did the policy. I've never heard about there being a stopping point in regards to how far left socialist democracy system is supposed to push before it's "principles" are satisfied, but my understanding was that it's at least until capitalism is abolished (and socialism emerges) or capital class is weak enough to be defeated via revolution of some sort. And so, since it's intended purpose is to push much further left instead of mantaining the current system and it's status quo, and some changes required to implement it's propositions are radical, I feel like it can't be reasonably called centrist system. Unless your definition of political center differs from mine, but it would require it not to account for both how far left the system intends to shift the society eventually, and also how radical the changes are in comparison to the current center. That, or what we understand as socialist democracy differs, wikipedia page for it mostly fits my definition, and I don't know where to look for more 'common' view on it.

[–] mriormro@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Status quo shifts. That's the very nature of the Overton window. The modern political zeitgeist has historically shifted to the left. The longer you go in one direction the more the previously held radical ideologies normalize and cohere towards institutionalization, as I said.

There is no limit on the axis of political ideology. One trends towards order and the other liberation. But people aren't one dimensional.