Currently, almost anyone in the Fediverse can see Lemmys votes. Lemmy admins can see votes, as well as mods. Only regular Lemmy users can't. Should the Lemmy devs create a way to make the votes anonymous?

There is a discussion going on right now considering "making the Lemmy votes public" but I think that premisse is just wrong. The votes are public already, they're just hidden from Lemmy users. Anyone from a kbin/mbin/fedia instance can check out the votes if they are so inclined.

The users right now may fall into a false sense of privacy when voting because the votes are hidden from Lemmy users. If you want to vote something and not show up on the vote list, please create another account to support that type of content and don't tell anyone.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mihnt@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 month ago (4 children)

They should just stay mostly hidden as they are now. I was harassed 3 times while using kbin for my voting habits. When I brought it up to ernest, him and mostly everyone else defended it, even though at the time I was actively being annoyed by someone.

It'll make less people vote in the long run and will scare people off.

Nothing worse than hopping on something I do for leisure to realize that thread I voted on a week ago has now come back to bite me in the ass because the OP decided to go on a crusade and harass everyone that downvoted them.

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Even for delusional tech bro bullshit, the idea that public voting on an anonymous forum will do anything other than create drama is pretty fucking detached from reality.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago

Please be vocal about this because I've seen two people say they didn't see this behavior. ❤️

[–] laverabe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

yep, tyranny of the majority is still tyranny. It's worth defending the 3% who disagree with the majority opinion cause, more often than not, sometimes the majority is wrong...

Defending the secret vote is the key to a functioning democracy, without it you just get cliques and in-groups who bully the outsiders. No one wins in that scenario, as critical thinking and critique are actively discouraged.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 1 points 1 month ago

If OP mass-downvotes you, then ban them. As it is, you have the ability to mass-downvote them, without them even knowing that it is you doing it. Or maybe you wouldn't do that, but some would - I hope you see how unequal that relationship is.