this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
620 points (88.8% liked)

Showerthoughts

29632 readers
904 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics (NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out)
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It sounds way less offensive to those who decry the original terminology's problematic roots but still keeps its meaning intact.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] d00ery@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The master in master branch is, I'd assume, from the idea of Master copy which refers to the original of something, eg a recording, drawing, etc. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/master-copy

I'm not hugely tied to the word, and things change ... So meh.

[–] meekah@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

While I agree with your assumption, I think main is less vague. Master can be interpreted several ways, including an offensive one. So while I agree with other commenter in that it's unnecessary to go back and change things retroactively, but just setting the default branch name for new repos in your version control to main is a fair thing to ask IMO.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

including an offensive one.

Is the code going to be offended? If so it's probably already offended by it's likely very bad code quality and lack of maintenance and repair.

[–] meekah@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not the code, but some of your coworkers might potentially be offended.

Also good job with the ad hominem.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

obviously the code wont be offended, i was just shitposting.

As for the code quality, it's not adhom, it's literally just true. Go ask any seasoned programmer, any senior dev, or any junior dev, they'll tell you it's all dogshit, except for the one pet project they have that hasn't ballooned into a mess yet.

And if you need proof, go load a website, tell me how clean and responsive it is. Surely it has no issues, and works on a cross platform standard. Oh wait it doesn't, surely that's do to a feature difference right? What's that? Spoofing the user agent fixes it? Hmm.

[–] meekah@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh, as a programmer myself I'm perfectly aware of how shitty most codebases are. It's just that the context you said this in implied that people who care about political correctness are worse programmers. Dont act like this wasn't on purpose and hide behind "shitposting".

oh, no, i just hate all programmers, no discrimination here lmao.

[–] ultramaven@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

When I start “whipping up” the pull requests, I’ll make sure to “rape” your suggestions

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

That’s offensive too. Proper terminology is “con/noncon”