politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Don Lemon says George W. Bush might be a speaker tonight.
https://x.com/donlemon/status/1826732615212392751
Jesus, can you imagine?
I mean, it would be on brand for the Dems. They've already forgiven all his war crimes and atrocious presidency.
Its about creating permission structures for Republicans who don't recognize their party to defect with their vote.
You don't have to condone dude A to let him tell the right audience that dude B is way bad.
Dems shifting to the right? The ratchet effect.
Thanks for self-identifying. Saved me some time.
Glad to catch it now considering the BS that account pushes…
Fighting to stop genocide is BS?
Ha there we go!
I was waiting for you to hit the genocide bingo card!
Say genocide again! You get a genocide! I get a genocide! we all get a genocide!
No one care about genocide except you!!!
Why would anyone care about genocide?
Did you see what Hasan said about it?
https://x.com/alexxstation/status/1826788166822441461
Did you see twitter? Holy crap! I believe things!
It’s pretty obvious why everyone writes you off as a charlatan. Keep posting BS while acting like the world is what’s wrong…
Saving democracy from a Trump presidency is a shift to the right?
Go ahead and end Genocide with your buddy Donnie then, if you want to keep the election pure from dirty Republican votes for a dem candidate.
Wow fuck all those people! She hugged someone!
They are so bad! You make such a point! She’s so shitty because of that photo! [BRANDED!]
Dare we say “mission accomplished” despite the fact that it’s totally off and has nothing to to do with anything? How far off the point is necessary?
How many photos do you need to keep up the appearance of being so far off?
https://newrepublic.com/article/157607/democrats-keep-embracing-george-w-bush
So bush is bad and you keep shitting on democrats why?
You’re getting pitiful at this point.
EDIT to add this is pitiful shit and you should feel pitiful.
You're defending GWB?
Hell no! I’m attacking your shitty logic based off a photo! You really are that dense?
How dense do you have to be to see that photo as evidence of anything?
They're defending GWB.
Removed, civility.
I mean, according to you and your utterly naive and uninformed takes.
You are defending a photo.
You forgot to switch alts.
???? You seem to describe your own problems.
Yea my naive take on a single photo…
Yet you’re telling me a woman hugging gwb impugns the entire Democratic Party?
Keep talking about uniformed takes…
Look.. A quick scan of your level of rhetoric and analysis, and I get that you don't get that you dont know shit about shit when it comes to politics.
I get that you think you get it.
But I also know that you don't.
So you not understanding the context or importance of a photo, its like, well of course this person wouldn't get it. They aren't' here to get it. They have the equivalent of a micro penis for an analytical lens to analyse the world through. And its not their fault. Not everyone can be a jimmy big dick when it comes to understanding complex issues.
“Look.. “ then mentions dick stuff…
I’m not sure wtf you’re getting at…
“A quick scan of my comments”… All this shows your own shit not mine.
The dick size stuff repeats that. Stop being weird! Bother with dicks on your own time. It’s really weird and I don’t need to bother with you and dicks.
Meanwhile keep posting a single photo a person hugging gwb and pretending that makes policy … keep harping on a photo and whining about dicks. That is clearly all you have.
Why is it that you wont address Ozma on their own terms then?
Why is it’s that “Ozma” refuses to address reality on its own terms?
I do address this account on its own terms the issue is they don’t address reality in the same fashion.
So fuck off with your ridiculous attack and find something better… is this the real “ozma” account?
Nah dude, its cus you actually don't know fuck about shit.
You are a bad faith, Blue MAGA, cult member.
Haha cool. Use that word. And pretend it means something…
Whaver 🤡
Exactly what “blue maga” means… a clown and a whatever…
The whatever being generous as you can’t even spell that shit…
I mean, you act like I give a shit what someone whose world view doesn't predict the sun rising has to say.
Like, its actually kind-of cute.
Cool. It’s what you got.
Good for you.
Ok 🤡
Exactly ding dong! Good for you!
hope so; harris getting supported by all of the living former (and present) presidents over trump would be quite the feat. some people in the thread need to understand not everything is for them; it's about appealing to moderates and potential republican voters too.