this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
1080 points (94.1% liked)

Political Memes

5511 readers
748 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DMBFFF@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Disagreement with the politically correct about transgender is necessarily transphobic.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Do tell me where you studied genetics at a graduate level to make the determination you just made.

Otherwise yeah, you're being a queerphobe.

[–] DMBFFF@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Your right: only the elite and/or those with a university degrees can discuss this issue.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You are defining a woman by her genes. So yes, I expect you to have a university degree to be able to make such an authoritative definition.

Just like I would expect you to have a degree in physics before making an authoritative definition based on properties of physics.

Believe it or not, Facebook University isn't a real university.

[–] DMBFFF@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

You are defining a woman by her genes. So yes, I expect you to have a university degree to be able to make such an authoritative definition.

Several decades ago, the authorities on the subject regarded homosexuality as a mental disorder. Fortunately not all LGBT lay-people deferred to their judgements.

Just like I would expect you to have a degree in physics before making an authoritative definition based on properties of physics.

So I need a degree to say "E=mc^2^."

Believe it or not, Facebook University isn’t a real university.

I never joined that site.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You are seriously doing the "science was wrong before" argument while trying to use science?

The whole point of science is that new ideas replace old ones when new information comes up.

I don't think you understand what science even is.

[–] DMBFFF@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The whole point of science is that new ideas replace old ones when new information comes up.

Agreed.

Also: wp:Argument from authority.

Did you know that Trump has a university degree and Dubya Bush went to Harvard and Yale?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You keep saying irrelevant things. You also have yet to define a woman. Isn't that interesting?

[–] DMBFFF@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A woman is a human female.

If a person has XX chromosomes, quite probably she is a woman.

Most people who describe themselves as women have XX chromosomes.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Okay, that's a partial definition. Now let's hear your full one. Since you are being an arbiter, we need a full definition.

[–] DMBFFF@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't have a full definition, however, I think my parameters apply to >98% of women and >98% of those with XX chromosomes.

IIUC, your definition of a woman is a person who self-identifies as one, and currently at least, most of those who identify themselves as women have XX chromosomes, and for that matter, female genitalia, breasts disproportionately larger than men, and naturally talk at slightly higher pitches.

I also think that this will be the case for at least a few decades, though what do I know?

If someone with XY chromosomes and male genitalia wants to call thonself a woman, fine, it's (still) a (relatively) free country, but just don't expect me to always play along—and with that, I expect to be banned for transphobia, because not only do I don't completely agree with the so-called progressives, but that I posted such.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

"This applies 99% of the time" is not a scientific definition.

Also, I never gave a definition.

but just don’t expect me to always play along

This is literally bigotry.