Games

16387 readers

902 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

250

PlayStation’s ‘Concord’ Did Not Break 700 Players On Steam On Launch Day (www.forbes.com)

submitted 3 weeks ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works

89 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 91 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Its an enormously overproduced Overwatch clone with zany characters that seem to be going for Guardians of the Galaxy, an art style that is basically just bizarre, and gameplay from a decade ago.

Sony wanted their own Overwatch, after seeing its success, then spent a huge amount of time and money developing it, and this is what they came up with.

Oh, right, it isn't free to play, costs 40 bucks, and then also has an astounding amount of microtransactions.

EDIT: Based off of current active player count, Concord has cost approximately $200,000 dollars per active player to produce.

Better hope they are all omega class hyper whale spenders, I guess.

[–] cafeinux@infosec.pub 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I just watched the trailer because I wanted to understand your comment. I definitely see the zaniness and Guardians of the Galaxy vibes. I always thought Overwatch was bizarre (but that's just me) but this is clearly more.

However, as someone that doesn't play shooters, could you develop more on what defines a gameplay from a decade ago? I wonder what can change that much in that kind of game.

[–] johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

I think they're just saying that hero shooters are a genre that saw a big boom around when overwatch came out but are now no longer trending.