194
submitted 10 months ago by Powderhorn@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] knotthatone@lemmy.one 3 points 10 months ago

So if someone builds an atom-perfect artificial brain from scratch, sticks it in a body, and shows it around the world, should we expect the creator to pay licensing fees to the owners of everything it looks at?

That's unrelated to an LLM. An LLM is not a synthetic human brain. It's a computer program and sets of statistical data points from large amounts of training data to generate outputs from prompts.

If we get real general-purpose AI some day in the future, then we'll need to answer those sorts of questions. But that's not what we have today.

[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 5 points 10 months ago

The discussion is about law surrounding AI, not LLMs specifically. No we don't have an AGI today (that we know of), but assuming we will, we will probably still have the laws we write today. So regardless of when it happens, we should be discussing and writing laws today under the assumption it will eventually happen.

[-] knotthatone@lemmy.one 1 points 10 months ago

This thread is about ChatGPT, an LLM. It is not a general purpose AI.

[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 4 points 10 months ago

I'm saying the discussion about AI law. You can't responsibly have a discussion about law around LLMs without considering how it would affect future, sufficiently advanced AI.

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
194 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37208 readers
125 users here now

Rumors, happenings, and innovations in the technology sphere. If it's technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS