this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2024
64 points (95.7% liked)

movies

22783 readers
214 users here now

Rules for Movies & TV Discussion

  1. Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.

  2. Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.

  3. On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.

Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.

AVATAR 3

Perverts Guide to Ideology

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

While watching Fist of Fury for the first time, Mao dissolved in tears, Liu recalled, and said "Bruce Lee is a hero!" Mao watched the film twice more. Liu said he did not know of any other movie that Mao viewed three times.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 19 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

That's a very concerning, maybe even unserious thing to say after already establishing the whole "no gods, no masters" thing

Nah dog, Heroic realism was a real agitprop tactic and as far as Mao's concerned, Bruce Lee was a living example of positive heroism for the proletarian masses.

We should be following Mao's stance on enjoying martial arts movies to a T

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Nah dog, Heroic realism was a real agitprop tactic and as far as Mao's concerned, Bruce Lee was a living example of positive heroism for the proletarian masses.

But it's very, very easy for that agitprop to become counterrevolutionary, both for actual people and for fictional entities, especially when such proletariat heroes shift from examples of what the masses can do to being seen as superior to them instead, like the decay of Superman from a working class hero to a Nolanesque Randian Ubermensch jackoff.

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The masses can have a little jojos as a treatkitty-cri

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I am a JoJo enjoyer, but that dynasty itself (and its affluent origins) is kind of sus, says Comrade Amogus. sus-soviet

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

stop-posting-amogus Let a hundred new Jojo families blossom!

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 15 points 3 weeks ago

From each according to their stands, to each according to their life energy. menacing menacing menacing

[–] EelBolshevikism@hexbear.net 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

heroism SHOULD be seen as directly correlated with one's solidarity and self-conception as a member of the proletariat

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yes, agreed! And as soon as someone ceases to do that (or in fiction, if they cease to be portrayed that way) it all goes to Great Person Theory shit. Again. kiryu-slam

[–] EelBolshevikism@hexbear.net 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Ironically, the more people in actual history seem to consider themselves part of that history rather than exempt from it, the more those people tend to be the ones that are the most influential for wide spread social changes. So-called great men wouldn't be great if they thought of themselves as great men... Because you need to understand you just didn't fall from a coconut tree kamala-coconut-tree if you are going to make change.

You can do as much evil as you want and think of yourself as special though, that seems very doable

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Did you not read the article? The scene that Mao was reacting to was one where Lee's character 'kicked and smashed a wooden panel bearing the words: "Chinese and dogs not allowed".' It was a scene of fighting very explicitly not just for yourself or as yourself but fighting for and as the oppressed.

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 8 points 3 weeks ago

I went off into the weeds there when I should have first established that I was wholeheartedly sympathetic of that particular contextual moment of Mao loving that moment and wanting to see it again and again. Sorry.