Technology

59629 readers

2617 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

401

EE warns parents against giving children under 11 a smartphone (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 3 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

145 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Let's go one step further...

VRChat on the Quest is not a babysitter!

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Is that a step further though? I feel like not giving kids access to VR Chat comes way before not giving them a smartphone in terms of restrictiveness or severity. It's a far more reasonable suggestion.

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Both... but a Quest is mainly designed for gaming, where a smartphone is designed to do everything. The smartphone restriction is an easy one to recommend.

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't follow. Wouldn't a limited-purpose device be easier to restrict than a general-purpose device?

Look at the Nintendo Switch. If there was ever an Internet-connected device to give your kids, it's a Switch. I have never heard of anything untoward happening to a child on Nintendo's online platform.

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

A Quest is an overpowered smartphone strapped to your face, with all the capabilities of such. You can restrict a smartphone too, but how many parents actually have that level of technical inclination? It's better to limit the youngest minds' times on these devices until they're a bit older, and you've had more time to teach them important life skills. Also, parents teach your kids important life skills from an early age, please.

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think we actually agree, maybe just a misunderstanding.

I don't believe that parental controls actually stop most kids from doing things they shouldn't, and I think these devices are bad for a growing mind compared to real world human experiences.

I think I misunderstood you earlier thinking you said that smartphones were easier to agree to giving children over a VR headset, because a VR headset is only for gaming. I think we both agree that they are bad.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Children will be raised initially by an expanded roomba with arms amd a babysitting AI.

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The first (and only) time I played VRChat, my takeaway was, "What kind of adult would want to play a game with this many preteens in every room?"

Then I answered my own question...

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, public worlds are cancer. It's best to get in with friends or groups.

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's not my point. Kids congregate in public worlds, and predatory adults know where to find them.

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

...and that is my original point.