this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
611 points (96.1% liked)

memes

9668 readers
2793 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nobleshift@lemmy.world 47 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

"Veganism needs to become a protected belief in every country" ... I spit my drink out laughing. What in the actual fuck?!?.

Just no. Why? Well beyond it's idiotic lunacy, I absolutely do not want any other dietary belief systems protected. Good God would that make a living legal nightmare.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

For context, the story I read a similar comment under was about a decades long vegan forest firefighter who was unable to receive vegan meals through his employer (given that they’re very much “in the field” they can’t really bring their own). After complaining, he was suspended without pay by the employer and he tried to fight that, arguing that his vegan lifestyle was a creed.

That context changes things for me at least, maybe not for you.

[–] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world -4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not for me, he should have arranged his own meals or not taken the job if his employer won't cater to his particular snowflakeism.

I'm low carb but I don't get to complain if all they have in the canteen is chips and candy.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s not really possible to arrange his own meals, and they told him they would give him vegan food.

If a person were sent on a work trip where it was impossible to get outside food, and their boss told them they could get them appropriate food, then didn’t, I think they should complain. Especially if it means that they essentially went hungry for weeks while doing a really active job. That’s crappy of their job to do, and they shouldn’t stand for it.

Snacks in the canteen is a totally different deal and I agree that a complaint is not really appropriate, but it’s reasonable to ask if they can supply a broader range of foods.

[–] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ok then breach of contract, he sues and all is good. In the meantime just eat the salad bar and get a big can of mixed nuts shipped to him.

Of course they shouldn't stand for it but workers protections are only as good as SCOTUS wants them to be and in that environment when it comes to food maybe it's time to compromise till you can get your documentary on it out. Everything is public opinion now, justice varies based on clout. It is reality and I hate it but it is reality.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Salad bar and shipping at a forest fire? If they have reliable access to those, I’d be very surprised. He also probably won’t be able to digest meat after 25 years of a vegan diet, so he’d be putting everyone in danger if he made himself sick at the scene of a forest fire. It’s not like there’s much to forage in that situation, so he just has to choose between hunger and illness.

The court ruled that his moral veganism doesn’t count as a protected belief system (this is in Canada), so when he did sue, they ruled in favor of his employer. I’m not sure why breach of contract didn’t apply, but his right to vegan food would have been protected by the court had he been vegan due to religious beliefs (the example given is Jainism). That’s why the comparison is to a protected belief.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Next up we need to officially protect Star Trek fans

[–] Rayspekt@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago
[–] nobleshift@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Asetru@feddit.org 5 points 2 weeks ago

What if I like both?

And could I register as a member of a sub-belief? Like, I'm a true believer of the unified collective of the Borg?

[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

Lets do that first.

[–] Noktan@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In order to understand that, you have to realise that veganism is not a diet, but an ethical belief. A huge part that often comes up is diet, of course, since we all eat, and often in a social setting. But it also concerns, for example:

Not using wool and leather

Not visiting for-profit zoos

Not using cosmetic tested on animals

Not riding horses or attending horse-related entertainment

It is an all-round ethical standpoint, and not just a diet fad. You may or may not agree with it, that's how beliefs work, but ridiculing the thought of it being a protected belief seems narrow minded.

[–] nobleshift@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Eh, I've lived with vegans, almost married a vegan, and spent a lot of years in Portland. I'm well versed thank you.

I do not believe in 'protected beliefs' any more than I do in religious rights. They have no place in the modern world.

Protection from unjust persecution and discrimination for holding beliefs should always be a thing, providing those practicing those beliefs do not in turn subject others who do not hold the same tenets to persecution or discrimination.

People have rights. Ideas, ideals, and beliefs do not, no matter how noble it may seem.