this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023
162 points (100.0% liked)

Chat

7483 readers
21 users here now

Relaxed section for discussion and debate that doesn't fit anywhere else. Whether it's advice, how your week is going, a link that's at the back of your mind, or something like that, it can likely go here.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For me I say that a truck with a cab longer than its bed is not a truck, but an SUV with an overgrown bumper.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Souvlaki@beehaw.org 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Microtransactions are not acceptable in full retail single player games. I don't care if it's only cosmetics. If i pay 60 bucks for it, i better get the whole damn thing. Looking at you, Diablo 4.

[–] HalJor@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Related: If it's more than 99¢, it's not a "microtransaction". There's nothing "micro" about $99.99. That's an "in-app purchase".

[–] Souvlaki@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

Absolutely. But you can see it the other way, the "micro" now refers to what you are getting and *not *what you are paying.

[–] Kryostar@mastodon.online 1 points 1 year ago

@HalJor @Souvlaki Microtransactions? More like Pettytransactions, amiright? :ablobcatbongo:

Further, I'm convinced the term "microtransaction" was introduced by corporations cynically and insidiously knowing full well they would ramp the price up over time deluding the meaning of the term.

[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Agree 100%. I'd honestly argue there shouldn't be microtransactions in any single-player game, unless it is free.

I miss the days when you unlocked cosmetics, etc. by actually playing the game and doing achievements rather than needing to buy them through "micro"transactions.