this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
-16 points (26.5% liked)

Atheism

4041 readers
113 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Imagine a world without organised religion, where it doesn't affect people's lives, but atheism still exists. What purpose would atheism fill in this scenario?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Atheism is the lack of a belief. The lack of believing in gods serves as much purpose as the lack of believing in goblins.

What purpose does the lack of believing in goblins serve?

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What purpose does the lack of believing in goblins serve?

Well, personally, my lack of believing in goblins serves my sense of reality. I am extremely sure goblins are made up, so my lack of belief serves my understanding of consistency and coherence of the world. Were goblins real, we likely could interact with them, if I understood them correctly.

IIRC, most religions hold that one cannot interact with their deities directly - so even if theism had just a grain of truth, its truth would be so irrelevant and far from people's lives (just another level of hierarchy) that I don't understand how its belief or disbelief affects one's sense of reality.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That makes no sense. You wouldn't even know goblins existed if someone hadn't told you stories about goblins.

Are you so easily swayed that your outlook on reality would have been altered just knowing about the existence of goblins in stories?

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Yes, my sense of reality would be altered if one could just write magical beings into interactable existence.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Isn’t that what religion is?

I mean, really. You dismiss the existence of goblins because they’re myths, but not of an all-powerful, all-knowing god… which is also just a myth?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not something that I suggested.

You claimed that merely knowing that goblins are a concept would alter your perception of reality. That's ludicrous. I do not believe your perception of reality was altered when you learned that goblins are a concept unless you uncritically believed they existed, in which case, you need to work on your critical thinking skills.

But you seem to be stuck on 'goblins.' So let's change it while still using the same basic metaphor:

The lack of believing in gods serves as much purpose as the lack of believing in snxxzxz.

What purpose does the lack of believing in snxxzxz serve?

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

snxxzxz or any other gibberish isn't yet associated with meaning. Once some gibberish would get meaning AND become embodied (ie observable existence), yes my sense of reality would be altered. Are you sure this is a critical thinking failure?

Are you saying atheism is a form of disassociation or gibberish-making of theist beliefs? If yes, I would consider that tool a purpose/function of atheism.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Why do you think the concept of a god automatically has meaning beyond a fiction?

That is all the meaning it has ever held for me.

Not believing in gods is the default. You must be taught about them first and convinced.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Ummm... So, religion?

[–] Hobbes@startrek.website 1 points 2 months ago

Well, personally, my lack of believing in goblins serves my sense of reality. I am extremely sure goblins are made up, so my lack of belief serves my understanding of consistency and coherence of the world.

You're so close to getting it!