this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
289 points (97.7% liked)

Fediverse

28706 readers
193 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
TragicNotCute@lemmy.world
Xylinna@lemmy.world
MrCenny@lemmy.world
automodbeta@lemmy.world
woelkchen@lemmy.world
289
What made everyone move to Bluesky or Threads instead of Mastodon? (lemmy.zip)
submitted 3 months ago by dch82@lemmy.zip to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
148 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

What made everybody move from a corporate social media platform to another corporate social media platform instead of the fediverse?

After all, the Fediverse and Activitypub is much more mature than Bluesky and the copycat AT protocol or Threads and ... whatever they use.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

I used mastodon for a year. It didn’t really work out for me. I just took so much effort to find content or build an audience.

I didn’t go to threads because it’s owned by Zuck. But Bluesky is FOSS add free and decentralised, so I tried it out, and honestly (I’ll probably get hate here for this) but the experience is far better than mastodon. There’s an algorithm, everything works. Mastodon had always been buggy for me. The UI is nice, the community is nice etc.

Plus thanks to bridgy, all of my bluesky posts are automatically displayed on mastodon and I can follow people from mastodon on bluesky.

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

decentralised

Is it really? I always heard that it's impossible to have another server independent from Bluesky's

Anyway, thank you for your comment!

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Blaze@feddit.org 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

In its developer’s blog, Bluesky stressed that “guardrails” are still in place. Most significantly, users can only self-host their own accounts for now, and in the next phase, self-hosted servers will initially be limited to 10 accounts each, with rate limits on usage.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 months ago

Yeah I’m self hosting. But the fact they are working towards it is what matters most. Bluesky has only been publicly available for a couple months at this point.