this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
320 points (94.2% liked)

Fediverse

28281 readers
647 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 56 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Mastodon.social just went over the 2 million user mark. The switch to fediverse and fediverse adjacent is going pretty quick.

[–] SquiffSquiff@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago (6 children)

I've been on Mastodon for over a year and the content simply isn't there. Several of the people that I follow on Twitter have tried moving or duplicating to Mastodon. They've had a fraction of the visibility and engagement from commenters that they would get on Twitter. Invariably after a few months they have essentially given up on it as a primary medium. For me the discoverability is essentially non-existent, which I don't think is helped by the idea of it being based around instance-local communities, which have no meaning when you're looking at something like Twitter.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

mastodon had their chance during the first exodus but they refused to listen to what twitter users wanted and shot down things like lists, quote tweets, and privacy controls.

mastodon is very gatekeeper-y

[–] aaaaace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And they sold out the people, who tried to help by posting, to Meta.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

That's not at all the problem here, no

[–] leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 2 months ago (27 children)

Maybe they should stop caring about visibility and engagement and concentrate on participating in, building and y'know enjoying a community?

[–] Tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 months ago

That can be difficult if your livelihood depends on it. Artists for example.

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

My experience has been better. User engagement is much higher per follower and the discussions don’t devolve. They’re much more useful and/or interesting. KPIs don’t measure everything.

[–] ericjmorey@discuss.online 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Many people are most interested in profit as their only KPI and mastodon puts up a lot of hurdles for those people.

[–] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's not the best platform for the profit driven, and I much prefer it that way.

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

This exactly. I was saying that as a user, not a creator. I make money away from social media so I don’t care to bring that to my personal space.

[–] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Guess it's not for you then. I'm having a blast. A lot of my friends are now in it and the last year or so have been great.

And more and more people seem to be moving.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

„The content“ is there. Its just the addiction inducing, never ending dopamine that doesnt flow as freely which is great.

If you follow the topics that are most prevalent on the fedi (eg freedom, activism, technology, diversity) you will not run out unless you scroll for many hours a day, which is suggests you find yourself a hobby.

Also, the self fulfilling prophecy of „the fediverse is too small, I go to big platform“ will keep the fediverse small.

Be the change you want to see.

[–] SquiffSquiff@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I feel this and some of the other comments in this thread are missing the point. It's not about me and my followers. It's about the news sources and topics that I search for or follow. They simply haven't moved to Mastodon and where notable individuals that I follow have tried, it simply hasn't worked out due to lack of interest. I'm not interested in the fediverse as a topic in itself, I'm interested in the topics and events I want to follow. Something happens and I can find and read and watch clips about it on Twitter. Not so Mastodon.

[–] ericjmorey@discuss.online 4 points 2 months ago

Bluesky is probably going to capture more of that than Mastodon. But threads is similarly struggling to develop it as well and they have very low barrier for new signups for anyone with a Facebook or Instagram account.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rglullis@communick.news 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

freedom, activism, technology, diversity

Boring, boring, boring, boring. This is all "meta-converaation", like this exact thread.

Where are the musicians, the woodworkers, the DIYers, the athletes, the architects, the photographers, the wannabe chefs, the contrarian educators who do not toe the line of Academia?

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)
[–] rglullis@communick.news 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Come on, you know that I'm talking about the people...

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 2 points 2 months ago

People post to the communities.

With this comment I was bringing them visibility, which is usually an issue.

On the side I keep promoting Lemmy on /r/Redditalternatives

Once we'll get more people, and they'll know where to find content, we'll be able to solve that issue

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't want to make Mastodon propaganda, but Mastodon talks around technology are much better than Twitter ever was.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 2 months ago

Hard disagree. It's true that the tech conversation has shifted away from Twitter post-Musk, but to claim that Mastodon nowadays Mastodon is better than ever was is just wishful thinking.

[–] AchtungDrempels@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Totally agree. But i don't know if there is any hope, so many fedi people seem to not want any normies (people not working with computers i guess) entering.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Maybe, just maybe, if your followers aren't willing to give up something vile because it's giving them a dopamine hit, they're not adding as much value to your life as you think.

[–] SquiffSquiff@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

people I follow

[–] rglullis@communick.news 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There is absolutely nothing "vile" about quote tweets. When used properly, it is used to enrich a discussion. It's not just because some idiot minority abuses a feature that it should be removed entirely. If well meaning people look at two different systems, and one of them is arbitrarily gutted of useful functionality, guess which one they will choose?

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sure, at the surface level of tweeting back and forth, there is nothing vile. But the very act of using the platform funds an agent of chaos that is doing very real harm, and to ignore that because it is inconvenient is at the most charitable interpretation a selfish and callous act. There are other means of discourse, and those with input that is valuable will follow you.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 2 months ago

I am saying "quote tweets" as a reference to the functionality, not the usage of Twitter itself.

Mastodon refuses to implement the functionality, but it is supported on others: Soapbox, Akkoma...