72% is shockingly high tbh. Makes me think the question wasn't phrased well. Or maybe the chuds in other G20 countries don't shit their pants if you mention that climate change is real?

[–] Hatandwatch@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Occam's Razor. "Should we send politicians to jail--" "Yes" "--for climate crimes? "

[–] robinnist@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

We can see the phrasing, at least in English:

It should be a criminal offence for leaders of large businesses or senior government officials to approve or permit actions they know are likely to cause damage to nature and climate that is widespread, long term or cannot be reversed

The responses “Strongly agree” and “Tend to agree” with the statement are the 72%

[–] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago

bloomer

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

that they know

How do we prove, definitively, what they knew at the time?

[–] Inui@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago

Looking at their emails and other messages to see if those risks were communicated and ignored. Forcing them to produce documents researching and stating their potential impact before they're allowed to undergo certain actions. Using common sense like "dumping garbage in a river is bad".