this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2024
38 points (71.6% liked)

Data is Beautiful

1165 readers
45 users here now

Be respectful

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl 21 points 2 months ago (2 children)

X = 100 → zero nutritious?
Why inverted?

[–] BlastboomStrice@mander.xyz 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Hope this helps:)

(The chart legend seems not to be placed properly, maybe that's why they mirrored the chart.)

Oi, I noticed the vertical axis is logarithmic, the impact difference is bigger than I thought.

[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl 4 points 2 months ago
[–] ekky@sopuli.xyz 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I feel that a lot of posts lately have been very "ugly" in terms of data representation. Dunno what that's about, or if it's just me.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

People upvote because they like the content of the data or how it supports their agenda, while forgetting that this community is supposed to be about judging the representation of it specifically. And that's assuming they're even paying attention to the community name in the first place, which many may not be.

It's been a perennial issue both here and in r/dataisbeautiful as long as I can remember.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

Try finding a genuinely oniony story on /r/nottheonion and not just a funny news article

[–] flora_explora@beehaw.org 2 points 2 months ago

Well, isn't that how it's also done on the reddit sub by the same name for years?