this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
1039 points (98.6% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3613 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Tim Walz has said he’s “sick and tired of hearing about thoughts and prayers” following the Apalachee High School shooting in Georgia, which left four dead.

Walz, who was named as Kamala Harris’ running mate in the race for the White House in August, spoke about the Wednesday (4 September) shooting at a campaign rally at the Highmark Amphitheater in Erie, Pennsylvania on Thursday.

He told his supporters: “We believe in the freedom to send our kids to school without being shot dead in the hall.”

“The news cycle moves on within a day,” he commented of the incident, adding that kids had returned to school feeling excited and “now we have four dead”.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think everyone sick of being in this time loop of the same result happening over and over. Action is the only solution.

[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

But the action is "ban guns" and the American populace does not want that.

[–] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

Majority in U.S. Continues to Favor Stricter Gun Laws - Gallup.com

  • Fifty-six percent of U.S. adults say gun laws should be stricter, while 31% believe they should be kept as they are now and 12% favor less strict gun laws. (2023)

CNN Poll: Most Americans want stricter gun control, but they’re divided on whether guns make public places safer

  • Overall, 64% say they favor stricter gun control laws, with 36% opposed, little changed since a survey taken last summer in the wake of a mass shooting at an elementary school in Uvalde, Texas. (2023)

Polls show a solid majority of Americans want gun control | Vox

  • Nearly three-quarters of Americans think that gun violence is a big or moderately big problem, according to a survey last year by Pew Research Center. And a majority of Americans think that the epidemic of school shootings could be stopped with drastic changes in legislation, according to a poll this week by YouGov. (2022)

Most Americans support these 4 types of gun legislation, poll says

Would be a lot more helpful to name politicians who are against gun control than the 'American Populace" who continues to be shot everyday.

[–] somtwo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

TBF, American gun manufacturers don't want it because that would slow sales and line might not go up

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I also think this. But now that I've thought it, what's the next step?

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Restrictive gun laws and ban shit. Fuck 2A and all the assholes screaming about them. If people are consistently proving they are not responsible enough for what the constitution affords them, fuck the constitution. It needs revising.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Restrictive gun laws and ban shit.

I don't have the power to do this. Only the politicians owned and operated by the gun lobby have this power, and they've been moving us in reverse.

Fuck 2A and all the assholes screaming about them.

I don't think shoving my dick through a hole in the 2nd Amendment is going to do anything to reduce gun crime. I certainly don't think trying to shove my dick into a guy screaming about 2A rights is going to fix things.

fuck the constitution. It needs revising.

It is very difficult to redefine the Constitution via legal channels. Especially if you're just some angry internet guy. You'd need enormous sums of money, a willing media, and a political class that responds to social pressure.

And even when guys like Mike Bloomberg enjoyed most of that, they failed to achieve more than local reforms thanks to the aggressive partisan pushback from conservatives in his old party.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Until a politician grows a pair nothing is going to change. I hear what you're saying outside of the tongue in cheek and it's such a mess. America has systemic issues which are by and large a result of what the system was designed to do.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Until a politician grows a pair nothing is going to change.

Trump took a bullet wound to the ear and he's still saying the same old stupid bullshit.

I don't think this is a question of growing a pair. The economic and social incentives to stay the course are simply overwhelming.

America has systemic issues which are by and large a result of what the system was designed to do.

And systems like this are resilient, intransigent, and self-perpetuating.

The slavish devotion to our gun policy is like a contagious mental illness.