this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
208 points (95.2% liked)

World News

38563 readers
2560 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think it's considered center left based on US politics. Our Overton window has shifted pretty far. The Swiss have universal healthcare and strict gun control. That can't be right by US standards.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's true that it's based on US standards, but it's also worth pointing out that the rating itself is completely arbitrary.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They clearly list the methodology they use on their website.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I suggest reading the methodology carefully. Picking a number between 0 and 10 is hardly a robust methodology. Any two people could follow it and come to completely different answers.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There is a whole lot more to it than that. You can read it here.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/methodology/

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The placement of the yellow dot is determined through a composite score derived from four distinct categories: Biased Wording/Headlines, Factual/ Sourcing, Story Choices, and Political Affiliation. Each category is rated on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0. indicating a lack of bias and 10 representing extreme bias. The average of these four scores is then plotted on the scale to indicate the source's overall Left-Right bias.

I wouldn't call picking four numbers 'a whole lot more ' personally. If you actually read some of the bias analysis it becomes more obvious how arbitrary it is.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The rubric is literally right below what you quoted

The categories are as follows:

  1. Biased Wording/Headlines- Does the source use loaded words to convey emotion to sway the reader. Do headlines match the story?

  2. Factual/Sourcing- Does the source report factually and back up claims with well-sourced evidence.

  3. Story Choices: Does the source report news from both sides, or do they only publish one side.

  4. Political Affiliation: How strongly does the source endorse a particular political ideology? Who do the owners support or donate to?

Just because it is a qualitative and not a quantitative assessment doesn't mean it's arbitrary.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes I agree, and just because there is a methodology doesn't make the result not arbitrary. Can you explain what number four means? How do I assess it, what's a 0, what's a 5 and what's a 10? How does number 2 relate to bias, isn't that a factuality rating thing , why is it in the bias rubric? It's a joke, each rating is totally arbitrary as there is no definition of what each one means beyond some vague description of the category. It's essentially pick a number, feels based.

I have worked with qualitive rubrics before and this one is barely worthy of the name honestly. Two people could take this rubric away and come to completely opposite conclusions based on their own biases.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We may have “universal healthcare” in that ~~everyone~~ every legal resident following the law, the law saying you must purchase health insurance, is technically insured.

But we don’t have public insurance, it’s run by private companies at exorbitant prices with crazy premiums. And since we have such a large insurance /phara industry here, they are in the pockets of the government. Hell, the big insurance and big pharma companies even own shares in our national bank!

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As much as it sounds like you don't like what you have, it's still better than the US.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s like the US but if it was illegal to not have health insurance, so literally being poor is illegal.

When someone says “universal healthcare” it sounds a lot better than that.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Gross Geneva monthly minimum wage is CHF 4426 or $4,940 according to a quick Google. In the US it's $1,330.

Edit. Even the highest US local minimum wage of $17 an hour is $2,992 a month.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Geneva is basically the only canton of 26 to have minimum wage. I’m on 8k per year for example.

Anyways, this isn’t an “I have it worst olympics”. But Switzerland is far inferior to countries who genuinely have “universal healthcare” meaning everyone can have healthcare even if they have 0 money. Instead of having “universal healthcare” through a weird legal loophole that excludes poor people by criminalising them.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In Switzerland, patients pay up to 8% of their personal income towards the cost of a basic insurance plan. If their premiums work out to more than 8% of their income, the government provides a cash subsidy to cover the difference.

https://www.internationalinsurance.com/health/systems/switzerland.php

My point in this whole thing is that everyone in Switzerland has healthcare and that healthcare is subsidized to be more affordable than in the US. That would be a left wing program here.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

No. Not everyone have it. And this is not true. Health insurance can cost over 20%.

I am not insured because I cannot afford it. Which means I am technically breaking the law.

Only left wing states like geneva, which also has that minimum wage, offer those generous subsidies.

I would not trust a website made for rich expats.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

All of that is irrelevant to my point that your right wing government has policies that would be far left in the US

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 1 week ago

The household net-adjusted disposable income per capita is $39KUSD for Switzerland and $51KUSD for America.