this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
248 points (93.7% liked)

politics

19120 readers
3320 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 110 points 1 year ago (6 children)

10 is old enough to be a mom.

16 is old enough to fall into a meat vat.

18 is old enough to give them a rifle.

[–] lemann@lemmy.one 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Old enough to raise a whole ass human, slaughter edible living things, slaughter edible flying living things... but not old enough to decide what changes affect your community.

Wow.

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

18 is old enough to decide to owe 200k on an education

[–] stu@lemmy.pit.ninja 13 points 1 year ago

18 is old enough to give them a rifle.

Actually 17 with parental consent.

[–] cultsuperstar@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

12 is old enough to enter the workforce without a permit or parental consent.

[–] Zana@startrek.website 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I did hunter safety when I was 12 in Wisconsin.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What else is there to do in Wisconsin though? Eat cheese? Tip over the cows? Disappear on lake Michigan or Superior?

[–] Baphomet_The_Blasphemer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No wonder my German ancestor settled there, buncha cows, cheese, foreboding natural features, and alcohal. Mustve reminded him of Baden.

[–] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Imagine a bunch of Oregon trail style settlers hiking to the entrance to Wisconsin, and the German starts whooping and hollering and the rest look like they've seen a ghost lmao

Knowing that side of the family he probably fought a bear for fun while in a berserk fury on the way there. Or he beat someone to death, its honestly 50/50.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

The NOFX song about Minnesota applies to Wisconsin I believe...

It's 3 o'clock at the Triple Rock Another round of watching Paddy talk It's where you wanna get snowed in when you get Snowed in, outside it's 10 below, is it day or night, we don't care or know What we know is that we don't wanna be Anywhere but here, please don't make us leave When in Minnesota and you got a drinking quota

[–] JeffCraig@citizensgaming.com -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I actually don't think most of our society is qualified to vote.

Voter rights should be determined by whether or not you know anything about what you're voting for, not based on your age. People should have to pass a test every year.

The problem with this line of thinking is who would set the standard for the test? The current controlling power would skew things so only their supporters are now qualified to vote. In order to have a free and fair election every citizen needs the right to vote, otherwise we might as well just go back to the days that only white male landowners get to vote.