this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
22 points (100.0% liked)
askchapo
22841 readers
319 users here now
Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.
Rules:
-
Posts must ask a question.
-
If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.
-
Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.
-
Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
She was cool in a trivia sort of way for being the only female emperor (she wasn't an empress), but that's pretty much it. Emperor Wu was good enough at politicking and cloak and dagger shit that not even being a woman was enough to stop her from seizing the throne, but she wasn't a liberatory figure by any means. She also didn't really change Chinese history in the grand scheme of things. There wasn't some great emancipation of women because a woman was somehow about to become emperor.
Yeah, that makes sense. I actually think the distinction between female emperor and empress is interesting, because (I think) it suggests becoming an empress in the first place wasn't possible due to the patriarchal structures. I am looking to research how she affected female gender roles / the view of women since becoming a ruler. I believe those in her closest political circles were all women, which must suggest she did it on purpose because she knew that hadn't been possible before?