this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
97 points (98.0% liked)

chat

8177 readers
278 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There are a bunch of sicko neoliberals and insufferable redditors there, yes, but there are also some normal libs and a few comrades, and it seems like a good way to encourage lemmy generally to re-embrace leftism.

I've been using an alt to talk on there and it's honestly not that bad. It's a little bad, but not that bad. I think if we just try to patiently explain ourselves, we have a reasonable chance of reaching people and shifting the general political alignment.

Those of us who aren't up to dealing with ghouls (I am frequently included in this group) can just stay at home here and that's just fine.

Anyway, just an idea. I would appreciate feedback.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] krolden@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Ive been seeing a lot of decently based comments coming from there but their politics sub is basically straight up state dept propaganda.

They banned me a while back for I dont even know why. Probably telling someone to go fuck themselves or something.

[โ€“] blame@hexbear.net 24 points 1 month ago

imagine being so small the state department doesn't even know you exist yet you voluntarily doggedly stick to their party line.

load more comments (3 replies)