this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
357 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

58138 readers
4364 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] skymtf@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The fate of Mozilla is sad, I know one day they will announce a move to chromium. It might be after a buyout but they will switch chromium and than die

[–] baseless_discourse@mander.xyz 2 points 18 hours ago

I don't think google will allow them to move to chromium. They need gecko to avoid anti-trust law suites.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 58 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If they switch to Chromium they lose their half a billion per year from Google to be the token “look we’re not a monopoly here’s competition” browser.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

Technically I think that's still "put us first on the search bar" money. You're giving the real under-the-table explanation.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

The fate of Mozilla is sad, I know one day they will announce a move to chromium.

why the fuck would they kill the thing that makes them money? Do you even understand what you are implying here??

[–] ConstipatedWatson@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Even if they did so, isn't Firefox entirely open source? At least their work could be forked (though I agree if they don't have the resources, hardly anyone else could make it)

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Sure, but is Google gonna pay them or you hoping they will do that work for free? A browser doesn't seem like a hobby project to me.

[–] IcyToes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

They can also use Yahoo or Bing as default for money.

The other option is diversify your revenue. Which is likely where the ad stuff comes in. If they can do that in a privacy respecting way with a facility to opt out, I have no objections. The loss of the biggest open source chromium alternative is massive and unthinkable.

For all the flaws of Mozilla, no one has forked, done better and put it out of business. It's easier to run it behind a keyboard with zero responsibility.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, but neither do many of the large open source projects that aren’t funded by Google.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Most large scale open source projects at this point are funded by somebody. usually because they have benefit to an enterprise somewhere. But I don’t know if an alternative browser really provides much enterprise support anywhere, sadly.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] skymtf@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I just want something rust based

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Have you tried putting your cast iron in the dishwasher?

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't bother. Just leave it on the sink with some water.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 day ago

Yes, officer, these two right here.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] rotkehle@feddit.org 12 points 1 day ago

I really hope servo takes off.