this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
405 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

59317 readers
5275 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Modern AI data centers consume enormous amounts of power, and it looks like they will get even more power-hungry in the coming years as companies like Google, Microsoft, Meta, and OpenAI strive towards artificial general intelligence (AGI). Oracle has already outlined plans to use nuclear power plants for its 1-gigawatt datacenters. It looks like Microsoft plans to do the same as it just inked a deal to restart a nuclear power plant to feed its data centers, reports Bloomberg.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] captainastronaut@seattlelunarsociety.org 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I just hope this deal doesn’t involve using their AI to monitor the reactor …

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

There actually has been good work on using AI to control fusion plasmas its at the point where it can keep them stable significantly better than any human or simple automated system.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You know, that actually makes sense. Fusion is so energetic and probabilistic in nature, plus it's effectively "charged fluid dynamics" and there are an impossible number of variables to handle. That's literally the kind of shit AI is great at.

Fission though? Not so much

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, stick rod in / pull rod out doesn't really need deep learning to make work well :p

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Apparently, I didn't learn that with my ex

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Yes in a research lab. Here we’re talking about Microsoft.

Have you ever used something they made? Did it meet your standard of being “good work”? No. It’s a greedy, soulless cash grab disguised as software that infects the entire organization and disables common sense.

M$ actually running a nuclear plant is a guaranteed disaster. Blue Screen of Death.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They're not running it, though. They're making a deal with the owners (an actual nuclear power company) who are going to run it themselves and sell Microsoft the output.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yes, thank $deity.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Have you ever used something they made? Did it meet your standard of being “good work”?

I mean you're ignorance of the products that they build or work on doesn't precipitate their badness. Let's start with the entire developer ecosystem that they have their hands deep in, it's a pretty damn good ecosystem.

You probably need to check your bias because it's leaking, negatively affecting your decision making.

Any company of this size is going to have shit products great products and literally thousands and tens of thousands of projects in between. You seem to be familiar with one product line, of hundreds or even thousands.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

*your*

And how long have you watched Microsoft do what they do? Is it more than five years? 10? 20? 30? Really?

You can genuflect to the Ballmers all you want but their less-sucky products are still the best garbage one of the most profitable businesses in the history of earth can provide.

I’m not talking about UX, or code that doesn’t crash. I’m talking about that and the purpose of it. Good software serves the purpose of the user. Micro$oft software serves Micro$oft primarily - and often exclusively. Then there’s the monopolistic practice they have of buying innovation and crushing it beneath their heel.

Whatever “ignorance” of their products I have has been very deliberately cultivated. Glad you like VS, you’ll benefit Microsoft through it in at least one, or many, ways.

And none of what they do is different from how they’ve always been. Their self-serving greed was on full display from the day Bill Gates started demanding payment for his software that others had been freely sharing with him. Feel free to remain in thrall to them.