this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
74 points (96.2% liked)

Movies & TV

22879 readers
128 users here now

Rules for Movies & TV Discussion

  1. Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.

  2. Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.

  3. On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.

Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.

AVATAR 3

Perverts Guide to Ideology

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

sorry, i should have picked a lower resolution poster image whoops (e: fixed)

Also holy shit this movie still kicks so much ass. I rewatched it recently and i was blown away by how excellent it still is 25 years later. Most movies do not age this well.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I kinda wish they didn't put heterosexuality in it :/ or a male protagonist :/ or green :/

The Matrix but when Neo pops the redpill he immediately becomes a cool gender

[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The green is part of why the movie still looks good years later. It hides green screen artifacting. One of the problems with green screens is sometimes they reflect green light onto things, creating an uncanny valley. This is especially a problem with shiny surfaces, like...say....black latex and sunglasses.

The Matrix hides it in plain sight by masking everything in a green filter. Mixed with practical effects, you don't notice when something is CGI or the CGI just looks good (like when the kid bends the spoon in the Oracle's apartment).

If you want to see a movie where green light reflects off surfaces it shouldn't and it looks like shit, in the first Thor movie it's really easy to spot. The Mandalorian has been a major breakthrough because they use a giant ass LCD screen (instead of a greenscreen) that forms half a dome around the set. This allows them to use CGI, but the light is much more natural looking.

[–] ComradeMonotreme@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I think the worst CGI in the whole trilogy, is when Neo fights the many Smiths in reloaded and even then it's a great scene and you could handwave it as the Matrix failing to render everyone completely due to the strain from what they're doing.

[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago

Yeah that looked like shit even when it came out. IIRC it was the first of its kind, though. The software they used was the best available and made specifically for Reloaded. Subsequent films outside the franchise would use improved versions of the same tech, which is why they don't look like garbage.

[–] ComradeMonotreme@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

One of the problems with green screens is sometimes they reflect green light onto things, creating an uncanny valley. This is especially a problem with shiny surfaces, like...say....black latex and sunglasses.

The Matrix hides it in plain sight by masking everything in a green filte

I do a bunch of green screen photography and editing, if I mess up and there's obvious green reflections I cheat and make it black and white.

[–] imogen_underscore@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

agree except for the green the green is good. and can't deny my soft spot for Keanu all the same