this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
92 points (97.9% liked)

Futurology

1695 readers
260 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

We don't need no stinking space elevator!

All we need are SKYHOOKS!

[–] JayTreeman@fedia.io 8 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Kursgesat forgets to mention the incredible forces that would put on the payload. NASA funded a study that suggested they start with a jet going mach 10, or 3.5 km/s. The fastest a person has ever gone is mach 6.7 or 2.02km/s. For efficiency sake, you'd want to get up to speed in a reasonable amount of time. I doubt humans can effectively use sky hooks. Could be really good for stuff though

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The fastest a person has ever gone is mach 6.7 or 2.02km/s.

Astronauts on the ISS are currently zipping along at at 7.67 km/s just fine. The issue is acceleration, not speed. Tethers rotate fairly slowly, so the acceleration should be less than that of a rocket launch.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Astronauts on the ISS are currently zipping along at at 7.67 km/s just fine.

And we've all been zipping around the sun at 29.78 km/s since each of our inceptions.

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Our Sun moves around the centre of the Milky Way at a speed of 240 km/s or 864,000 km/h, so do we plus or minus ~30km/s!

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 5 days ago

NASA funded a study that suggested they start with a jet going mach 10, or 3.5 km/s. The fastest a person has ever gone is mach 6.7 or 2.02km/s.

In a jet. In a rocket, just the ISS is going at >7km/s, so obviously it's routine. A (scram)jet would be nicer from a fuel point of view, but you don't need it. In any case, to get to double the velocity with the same acceleration, you just accelerate twice as long - space is always big enough for a pure rocket-type craft (beamed power or gun-type are a different matter).

When it comes to the skyhooks themselves, the study you're thinking of gave a spread of different accelerations for the designs, from <1 G to quite heavy (but manageable for a trained professional).