this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
75 points (100.0% liked)
Spaceflight
576 readers
20 users here now
Your one-stop shop for spaceflight news and discussion.
All serious posts related to spaceflight are welcome! JAXA, ISRO, CNSA, Roscosmos, ULA, RocketLab, Firefly, Relativity, Blue Origin, etc. (Arca and Pythom, if you must).
Other related space communities:
- !rocketlab@lemmy.nz
- !curiosityrover@lemmy.world
- !perseverancerover@lemmy.world
- !esa@feddit.nl
- !nasa@lemmy.world
- !spacex@sh.itjust.works
- !astronomy@mander.xyz
- !space@lemmy.world
Related meme community:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This article is a bit of hype, but also the problem should be taken seriously as NASA has rated it as a high probable and high significance event.
There is a small Russian module that is leaking atmosphere at a rate of 3.3 lbs per day. It can be mitigated by closing the hatch to the module, but doing so reduces the number of Russian ports from 4 to 3. The article states eventually the hatch to that module will need to be permanently closed.
They don’t know the root cause, but assume it’s the welds.
So, losing a port = bad, but the space station can continue on.