Technology

60087 readers

2815 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

735

What the hell Proton! (r.nf)

submitted 2 months ago by King@r.nf to c/technology@lemmy.world

263 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

For the use case of encrypting your traffic while using a public WiFi, both commercial VPNs and self-hosted ones provide the same functionality.

[–] OR3X@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think the point they're getting at Is that you can't use a self-hosted vpn to hide your piracy activity because the link is registered to yourself.

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but this thread is about security while using public Wi-Fi, which the original comment was saying doesn't require commercial VPNs.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

And I highly doubt people are pirating while on public wi-fi, the bandwidth just isn't good enough, and even if it was, it would be a dick move to other public wi-fi users.

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes that’s true. But also that’s the wink and nudge marketing claim that VPN marketers make while everyone knows the real reason you are using a VPN.

With HTTPS, DNS-over-HTTPS, and most endpoint firewalls dropping non-gateway traffic, the risk is a lot less than the VPN ad reads want you to believe

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

DNS-over-HTTPS sounds like it'll be the least used by general public since most people I know are still using default DNS settings which would point towards their ISP's. I'm not sure how many ISPs have moved towards DNS-over-HTTPS or if they are even activated by default.

[–] exu@feditown.com 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Firefox has DoT enabled by default, maybe Chrome does the same. That would cover the use-case of most people on public wifi.

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wait, it's set in the browser? I've always thought you set that at the OS level.

[–] exu@feditown.com 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Both, the browsers (and any other application) can choose to ignore your DNS settings and use whatever other mechanisms they like.

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

Cool, didn't know that. I'll try and find the setting in the browser.