this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
86 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

60036 readers
2934 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
86
Hetzner launches s3-compatible object storage (docs.hetzner.com)
submitted 2 months ago by 1984 to c/technology@lemmy.world
23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I can't express how much I love hetzner doing this. There is a huge market for people who just need some instances and reliable/cheap object storage to run their apps.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Apollo2323@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Cloudfare s3 is expensive. Why did you decides going with them?

[–] SMillerNL@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Inertia/convenience mostly. I needed a little bit of storage and already had ddos protection through them.

[–] myersguy@lemmy.simpl.website 2 points 2 months ago

It is and it isn't. It's super dependant on use case. They bill on operations, not bandwidth. Obviously if you are hosting video/audio to be streamed, that could mean massive savings.