Technology

59542 readers

3208 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Hetzner launches s3-compatible object storage (docs.hetzner.com)

submitted 1 month ago by 1984 to c/technology@lemmy.world

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I can't express how much I love hetzner doing this. There is a huge market for people who just need some instances and reliable/cheap object storage to run their apps.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] bjorney@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's really not that complicated. At a high level:

$5/mo for having the service turned on
$5/mo for every TB storage above and beyond the first 1TB
$1 for every TB of data transfer beyond the first 1TB in a month

And then divide those numbers because it's actually billed by the hour

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That makes a lot of sense, and I'm going to blame me coming off a flu and seeing a wall of math and my brain going 'uh what'.

[–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I do think the phrasing is complicated, IIRC Hetzner moved from monthly to hourly billing recently, so they probably had to have legally well-defined terms while also wanting to do a monthly-based system in hourly terms.

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 5 points 1 month ago

I wasn't aware they had changed billing from monthly rates, which makes them doing all this hourly math stuff make a lot more sense.

The way they phrased the amount of data you get hourly that's counted as free and then rated against a monthly rate threw me since it looked like they billed based on monthly AND then buckets, but the buckets had some portion of free data based on how long the bucket existed, and that transfer was based on the same metric.

Just a very excessively detailed and precise way to do it, but then again, being from Germany I suppose that should be expected.