this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
1393 points (98.7% liked)

World News

38554 readers
2687 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] patomaloqueiro@lemmy.ml 40 points 1 year ago (4 children)

All the rich would be arrested

[–] ThisIsMyLemmyLogin@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

No, they'd be able to afford the best lawyers. It's the poor who would be punished the most. We already have fines for not recycling properly, even though the rubbish all gets mixed back together in Turkey or China and burned anyway. We have to use soggy paper straws with our drinks while the rich blanket the atmosphere in burned fuel from the private jets.

[–] Yokana@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Thats a true revolutionary cry. But since being "rich" is quite a relative term, you might wake up in the realization that most of the world considers you rich and your lifestyle complicit in the mass destruction of the global environment.

[–] LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's quite the stretch. Don't regulate the rich cause we might be caught up?

I don't take private flights from one side of a city to another. I don't own a yacht (or 6). I don't own a fleet of vehicles with a staff that drives them around. I don't throw away more food than most people eat. I don't horde dozens of acres of land that contain nothing but wasteful lawn.

There's a pretty stark contrast between the ultra wealthy, and the vast majority of people living in highly developed countries.

[–] bundes_sheep@lemmy.one -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When people get in a rage about "the rich", those kinds of distinctions generally go out the window.

[–] RegularGoose@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You're not wrong, but it's not likely that a bunch of moneyless people from third-world countries are going to come over and genocide us.

[–] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Said the bronze age prior to the arrival of the sea people

[–] RegularGoose@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The "sea people" weren't a bunch of starving refugees, they were well-supplied and organized military invasion forces, but sure.

This is a form of slippery slope fallacy. Rich in this context refers to portion of society contributing to pollution on a massively higher scale than even an upper middle class American. How many 'rich' Americans regularly fly private jets or take yachts? How many average joes own and operate a cruise line or a refinery?

I think with regards to poorer people in other countries, they'd be on the same page with 99.99% of Americans about who's considered so rich that they alone pose a threat to global health.

[–] Landmammals@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

No, we would just abolish corporations

[–] Caitlynn@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

They should but never will, Laws don't apply for rich people and even if, jail would BE to good for them