this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
639 points (98.3% liked)

News

23622 readers
2906 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I admit I do love it when Trump gets trolled.

(Weirdly, the post title didn't match the headline in the actual link, but the version Lemmy let me click on to make the title works better anyway.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He needs more than his supporters to win, the election is a toss-up, and his supporters are dumping him.

...are you going to tell me he's shifting left, because that would be ludicrous, but seems to be the only way to draw a coherent thread out of what you're saying?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No? I'm telling you that he can't win with just his supporters. Are you suggesting he's definitely going to win and no one should bother voting for Harris? What is the point of this discussion if you aren't?

[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Are you suggesting he's definitely going to win and no one should bother voting for Harris?

Let's see...

You do understand the election is a toss-up, don't you?

Guess not.

I understand you said he can't win with just his supporters - you also said he's losing those supporters. Putting aside the fact that people voting for him are definitionally supporters, you understand that those 2 statements clearly imply that there's no need to vote for Harris, right?

My point is that you're all over the place with your talking points - there doesn't seem to be any way to thread them together.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I did not say he was losing supporters.

This is what I said:

many of those people are willing to vote for him because they always vote Republican, not because they like him. And they’re being shaved off bit by bit.

I have no idea why you're lying when the comment chain is right there.

[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And they’re being shaved off bit by bit.

Who is the "they" if not people that would vote for Trump, and what do you mean by "shaved off" if you don't mean they won't be voting for him?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is the third time. What part of this is unclear to you?

many of those people are willing to vote for him because they always vote Republican, not because they like him.

Those are not his supporters. There's a difference between voting for someone and supporting them. I didn't support either Clinton or Biden. I voted for them because they weren't Trump.

[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Would it be fair to rephrase that as the people you've said he needs are abandoning him? What does that suggest about the need for people that oppose Trump to vote?

I don't know how you think lining up to vote for the head of the Republican party isn't supporting both the party and the head of the party, but that nonsensical position is beside the point.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No, it wouldn't be fair to change my words. But I can see why you would want to rather than acknowledge you didn't understand what I was saying.

[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In that case, I'll rephrase my question.

~~Would it be fair to rephrase that as~~ Should I take that to mean that the people you've said he needs are abandoning him? What does that suggest about the need for people that oppose Trump to vote?

My point the entire time is that what you're saying is nonsense. You're saying he's being abandoned by the people he needs - whether it's his supporters or non-supporters that will line up and support him by voting for him, and in response to me pointing out the election is a toss-up, you're accusing me of suggesting people don't need to turn out to vote and lying.

You see your flagrant hypocrisy and dishonesty here, don't you - or does the same deficiency that undermines your ability to understand the meaning of "support" similarly affect your reading comprehension and/or understanding of basic causality?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nope. There would only be hypocrisy and dishonesty if I said he would definitely lose and so you shouldn't vote.

I said no such thing.

I didn't even say you said that. I asked you if that's what you meant. Then you got all upset and decided it was an accusation.

[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh - I see how it works.

Are you the kind of weasely, hypocritical liar that fails to understand commonly used words and basic causality while suggesting people are saying the opposite of very clear statements people have made with nothing that could possibly be interpreted as a contradiction, as you insist that obviously leading questions can't be interpreted as accusations?

That was easy - let's see how far this takes us...

Are you some kind of kiddy fiddler? An unrepentant moron? An obvious liar?

I'm just asking honest questions, you see. No implied accusations or anything. Don't get all upset - who would see that as an accusation?

Fuck me, this is asinine - your nonsense is laid bare at this point - I'm out.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

As I said, I asked you a question and you decided it was an attack. Even after I let you know it wasn't. It wasn't a loaded question, I honestly wanted to know.

I'm not your enemy. I don't even know you.

But I'm guessing you'll decide this is another attack.