this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
483 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

58731 readers
4252 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

We’ve been anticipating it for years,1 and it’s finally happening. Google is finally killing uBlock Origin – with a note on their web store stating that the ...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] underthesign@lemmy.world 21 points 7 hours ago (10 children)

Firefox needs to work on ensuring seamless compatibility with more websites, web apps and so on, because I'm personally very bored with my kids' schools and related services sending out emails and forms with links that simply won't open in FF but are clearly expecting Chrome or Edge where they work fine. Yes, this is on the lazy developers, but if FF want wider scale take-up outside of geeky niche groups then this is the stuff they must fix.

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 1 points 29 minutes ago

What you're talking about is webcompat and is a very complicated issue. Also I've talked to some Mozilla devs who gave me multiple examples of Chromium rendering something wrong, and they'd have to intentionally break Firefox to render it incorrectly too, just so the end user would get a more consistent experience. Of course these issues happen more and more when things are only tested for one browser.

[–] kava@lemmy.world 3 points 57 minutes ago

I can't think of a single example where a web page doesn't work on FF.

if FF want wider scale take-up outside of geeky niche groups

Lol. I remember when FF was the most popular browser.

[–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 0 points 55 minutes ago

I just want my modern codecs to function. Why can't I play .mov or h264??

[–] gerbler@lemmy.world 55 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

I've said it before and I'll say it again. If your site doesn't work on Firefox your site doesn't work. As web developers your job is to develop applications for the web not for one specific browser. This goes double for essential services.

[–] Marx2k@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

My job requires login to most internal websites via Microsoft Azure AD SSO using Kerberos authentication using passwordless, smart card auth.

This switch happened this week. Up until yesterday I was 100% Firefox until this.

Firefox for MacOS is not able to do this. I spent an hour or so looking for solutions. Chrome on MacOS also doesn't. Safari does and now I have to fucking use Safari FFS.

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Could be worse. You could have to use Chrome.

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 1 points 27 minutes ago

Eh, I'd still take Chromium anything over the dumpster fire that is Safari

[–] Rykzon@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 5 hours ago

Doesn't really matter to a regular user, in that case it's"Firefox doesn't work"

[–] figaro@lemdro.id 1 points 4 hours ago

"ugh just use a normal browser"

  • everyone
[–] fxdave@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Slack calls disabled for firefox users, but if you change the user agent to chrome it works...

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 hour ago

Almost like it does work on Firefox but for some reason they don't want you using it. Honestly it's so damn weird, why do that? Is there some incentive for them?

[–] tehmics@lemmy.world 16 points 6 hours ago

Okay that's fine, but when websites are effectively writing

if user_agent_string != [chromium]
     break;

It doesn't really matter how good compatibility is. I've had websites go from nothing but a "Firefox is not supported, please use Chrome" splash screen to working just fine with Firefox by simply spoofing the user agent to Chrome. Maybe some feature was broken, but I was able to do what I needed. More often than not they just aren't testing it and don't want to support other browsers.

The more insidious side of this is that websites will require and attempt to enforce Chrome as adblocking gets increasingly impossible on them, because it aligns with their interests. It's so important for the future of the web that we resist this change, but I think it's too late.

The world wide web is quickly turning into the dark alley of the internet that nobody is willing to walk down.

[–] menemen@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Can you send me an example? I don't think I ever really encountered those sites and I use FF almost exclusively for ~20 years.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Its a frequency of use thing, and also some required sites. Examples are sites hosted by schools, government, or workplaces.

Although most people using Firefox aren't aware of spoofing the client to look like chrome, so that might need to be talked about more.

That all said, I don't have problems with any required usage, the only ones I have an issue with are on my phone, using mull, some sites payment forms won't load or work correctly. Taco bell is pretty bad for that and then the app wouldnt work either for a while. I also run grapheneos though so its hard to say what's the cause there.

[–] menemen@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Hm, okay. Maybe it's just a US government page thing then. Here in Germany firefox is still at 20% and used to be the standard browser until 5-6 years ago, so maybe pages are still optimized for it here.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

It varies state to state here as well. Someone in Georgia might have way more problems than someone in Minnesota. Its hard to generalize the US in that way. Sort of like the EU being a group but each country separate.

[–] yoasif@fedia.io 20 points 7 hours ago

Firefox can't fix all the broken sites in the world, but they do investigate issues reported to https://webcompat.com

You can help by reporting sites that don't work for you.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I encounter this very infrequently. I think I only have 1-2 examples at work. It's not a huge deal for me to spin up a chrome for those one or two occasions.

[–] Damaskox@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I recall I didn't get some sites working on Chrome either, when Firefox fails me 😅

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 1 points 53 minutes ago

This is also true. The majority of the time when something doesn't work on Firefox and I try to go to Chrome, it doesn't work there too 😂

[–] jinarched@lemm.ee 2 points 6 hours ago

What to do when the site is not compatible with Firefox: Alt + ←