this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
238 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19050 readers
3833 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] distantsounds@lemmy.world 33 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

"We must overturn the disastrous Citizens United Supreme Court decision and move to public funding of elections," said Sen. Bernie Sanders.

‘That’s Oligarchy,’ Says Sanders as Billionaires Pump Cash Into ~~Trump~~ Campaigns

ftfy, Common Dreams

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 11 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

You're not wrong, but let's not lose sight of the fact that the ratio is decidedly in favor of ultra-Conservatives

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Which makes it even dumber that Dems prioritize fundraising above the wishes of their constituency. Just look at how far to the right Kamala has been dragged by the donors, and marvel at the Dem strategists’ head scratching as to why she’s slipping in the polls. This system is totally broken for all but the rich and corporations.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 1 points 27 minutes ago

Tbh, I don't see things the way you see them.

Ignore the polls. Know what's at stake, like judicial reform, LGBTQ rights, climate action, women's rights, etc.

Most importantly, show up and vote. It matters.

[–] distantsounds@lemmy.world -3 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

imo, painting this as a ratio thing or a lib v conserv problem, is language that will not help to remove it. Money should not be a metric for policy whether aligns with your beliefs or not.

[–] OlinOfTheHillPeople@lemmy.world 2 points 43 minutes ago

I mean, you're the one who started this very thread with a "both sides" comment...

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I agree, which is why I said you're not wrong. But when focusing efforts, you need to know what you're up against and not presume they're all created equal.

[–] distantsounds@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Definitely. I’m not trying to be combative here either. This is a class issue and both established political parties operate through the means of their financial backers. Looking at this as “both sides are wrong” may be the best way to get a push for non-partisan resolution and actually get citizens u removed

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 1 points 1 hour ago

I like the way you think