this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
1691 points (98.7% liked)

Comic Strips

12285 readers
1455 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 182 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Basically how I browse the internet these days .... if I have to click on a bunch of stuff, sign up, register, accept a bunch of notifications, cookies, blah, blah, blah ... all because I want to read 200 words on your dumb site ... I'm not even going to bother with your site, skip and find a different source that is easier.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I go a step further and block them in DDG. This includes any "article" I have to scroll through to find the answer.

[–] Goun@lemmy.ml 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] TheBraveSirRobbin@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

I am also intrigued

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 28 points 2 days ago

if I’m curious, I’m going through https://archive.today – not only are your ads not getting seen, you’re not getting my page views either

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I love cookies!

.......not the browser kind. I'm partial to chocolate chip!

[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 7 points 1 day ago

My default setting for chocolate chip is to Accept All

[–] archonet@lemy.lol 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Get PopUpOFF and AdNauseam. Don't just back down without a fight. If I need to read an article to find some information I am going to read it, dumb bullshit be damned, even if I have to break half your site to do so. I've even been spiteful enough to hack away at the page with inspect element if it still manages to get past those add-ons.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 days ago

Generally for news websites ... especially highly rated ones that are supposed to be the best professional outfits ... if I can't use 'reader view' and just read your copy ... I'm skipping your site and never going back to you.

All I want to do is read the news ... you don't need to sell me on a great refrigerator or a cigarette lighter that has a flame that can melt steel because I'm never going to buy it.

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

anytime blocking elements is the correct choice noscript is better

[–] archonet@lemy.lol 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

NoScript tends to break more things on the page than is desired, in my experience, I used to use it but eventually I got rid of it because of the hassle of "is this the one I should add an exception for to make it work? No. How about this one?" repeat until you figure it out, and then repeat the whole process for every website you ever use

Using AdNauseam's built-in uBlock, I can use its element picker if something is particularly stubborn

Don't get me wrong, I like NoScript as a concept and think it should exist for the subset of users who want that functionality, but it's not for me.

and then repeat the whole process for every website you ever use

The thing is that you soon reach a point in which most of your frequently visited sites are already properly permissioned. After that, only newly visited domains need any special attention, and that's assuming you're there to do anything other than read some text or view an image.