this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
304 points (98.1% liked)

Facepalm

2593 readers
554 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Starbuncle@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Maybe hypothetically in the future, but it's plainly obvious to anyone who has a modicum of understanding regarding how LLMs actually work that they aren't even anywhere near being close to what anyone could possibly remotely consider sentient.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz -4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Sentient and capable of suffering are two different things. Ants aren't sentient, but they have a neurological pain response. Drag thinks LLMs are about as smart as ants. Whether they can feel suffering like ants can is an unsolved scientific question that we need to answer BEFORE we go creating entire industries of AI slave labour.

[–] Starbuncle@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Sentient and capable of suffering are two different things.

Technically true, but in the opposite way to what you're thinking. All those capable of suffering are by definition sentient, but sentience doesn't necessitate suffering.

Whether they can feel suffering like ants can is an unsolved scientific question

No it isn't, unless you subscribe to a worldview in which sentience could exist everywhere all at once instead of under special circumstances, which would demand you grant ethical consideration to every rock on the ground in case it's somehow sentient.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 1 points 41 minutes ago

Show drag a scientific paper demonstrating that ants or animals of similar intelligence can't suffer. You're claiming the problem is solved, show the literature.