unions

1379 readers

125 users here now

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

cyu@sh.itjust.works

273

New York Times: CEO gets 36% raise, employees get 3% (union.place)

submitted 4 weeks ago by cyu@sh.itjust.works to c/unions@sh.itjust.works

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 11 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

A CEOs salary is often just a small part of the compensation.

During some tech bubble bursts, many CEOs parade around saying they'll only pay themselves a "dollar" for salary. What they aren't telling you is their millions of stock options they'll earn.

[–] sapetoku@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

What they aren’t telling you is their millions of stock options they’ll earn.

Non-taxable, too.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Well, tax-deferred, since you don't pay tax until you sell. And if it's inherited, you get a free step-up in bases, so your kids won't pay the tax either.

And I think Kamala Harris really screwed the pooch on this one. She ranted about taxing unrealized capital gains, which is going to tick off pretty much all the billionaires (and therefore their monetary support would move to her opponent), whereas if she just said she'd tax stock grants for people in executive positions (or over a certain income), they probably wouldn't be as pissed because they're largely founders, and thus there's no stock grant to be taxed (it would mostly hit non-founder C-suites). In practice, this would just mean tax basis is stepped up at the time stocks vest, provided you're above a certain income.