this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
17 points (94.7% liked)

micromobility - Ebikes, scooters, longboards: Whatever floats your goat, this is micromobility

2311 readers
42 users here now

Ebikes, bicycles, scooters, skateboards, longboards, eboards, motorcycles, skates, unicycles: Whatever floats your goat, this is all things micromobility!

"Transportation using lightweight vehicles such as bicycles or scooters, especially electric ones that may be borrowed as part of a self-service rental program in which people rent vehicles for short-term use within a town or city.

micromobility is seen as a potential solution to moving people more efficiently around cities"

Feel free to also check out

!utilitycycling@slrpnk.net

!bikewrench@lemmy.world

!bikecommuting@lemmy.world

!bikepacking@lemmy.world

!electricbikes@lemmy.world

!bicycle_touring@lemmy.world

!notjustbikes@feddit.nl

!longboard@lemmy.world

It's a little sad that we need to actually say this, but:

Don't be an asshole or you will be permanently banned.

Respectful debate is totally OK, criticizing a product is fine, but being verbally abusive will not be tolerated.

Focus on discussing the idea, not attacking the person.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Why do they count the San Francisco Bay Area as one city? The area includes over a hundred municipalities.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Because political jurisdictions are completely arbitrary. The Bay Area is largely one continuous conglomeration of cities. It makes sense when you’re examining the whole country to lump similar areas together.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Political jurisdictions aren’t arbitrary if you’re considering things like bike lanes, street repair, etc. (And having lived in several locations around the area, there’s also a lot of variation in terrain, weather, traffic behavior, and number and kinds of cyclists.)

It might still make sense to group cities into metropolitan areas in spite of those factors, but then why didn’t they do it for any of the other cities?

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

They did though. The Bay Area is a lot more Balkanized than most urban areas for topographic reasons but for example they include St. Paul and Minneapolis one city despite being separated legally. I’m sure the other major cities have lots of little satellite cities included in the analysis too, they’re just not famous enough to be called out that way.

And yes there are some differences but there are a lot of similarities. Especially culture, weather, etc. When looking at the different places across the country, Bay Area cities are relatively similar with a few outlier exceptions.